The innate immune response plays a critical role in traumatic brain injury (TBI), contributing to ongoing pathogenesis and worsening long-term outcomes. Here we focus on neutrophils, one of the "first responders" to TBI. These leukocytes are recruited to the injured brain where they release a host of toxic molecules including free radicals, proteases, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, all of which promote secondary tissue damage. There is mounting evidence that the developing brain is more vulnerable to injury that the adult brain. This vulnerability to greater damage from TBI is, in part, attributed to relatively low antioxidant reserves coupled with an early robust immune response. The latter is reflected in enhanced sensitivity to cytokines and a prolonged recruitment of neutrophils into both cortical and subcortical regions. This review considers the contribution of neutrophils to early secondary pathogenesis in the injured developing brain and raises the distinct possibility that these leukocytes, which exhibit phenotypic plasticity, may also be poised to support wound healing. We provide a basic review of the development, life cycle, and granular contents of neutrophils and evaluate their potential as therapeutic targets for early neuroprotection and functional recovery after injury at early age. While neutrophils have been broadly studied in neurotrauma, we are only beginning to appreciate their diverse roles in the developing brain and the extent to which their acute manipulation may result in enduring neurological recovery when TBI is superimposed upon brain development.
Despite the high incidence of brain injuries in children, we have yet to fully understand the unique vulnerability of a young brain to an injury and key determinants of long-term recovery. Here we consider how early life stress may influence recovery after an early age brain injury. Studies of early life stress alone reveal persistent structural and functional impairments at adulthood. We consider the interacting pathologies imposed by early life stress and subsequent brain injuries during early brain development as well as at adulthood. This review outlines how early life stress primes the immune cells of the brain and periphery to elicit a heightened response to injury. While the focus of this review is on early age traumatic brain injuries, there is also a consideration of preclinical models of neonatal hypoxia and stroke, as each further speaks to the vulnerability of the brain and reinforces those characteristics that are common across each of these injuries. Lastly, we identify a common mechanistic trend; namely, early life stress worsens outcomes independent of its temporal proximity to a brain injury.
BackgroundAdherence to multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is
commonly assessed through patient reporting, but patient-reported adherence
is rarely studied.ObjectiveTo determine rates of DMT adherence reported from patient to clinician,
reasons for nonadherence, and relationships between adherence and
outcomes.MethodsWe identified relapsing–remitting MS patients on DMT for ≥3 months. DMT
adherence was defined as taking ≥80% of doses. Linear and logistic
regression models were created used to determine the association of baseline
adherence with several patient reported outcomes and the timed 25-foot walk
at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after the index visit.ResultsThe analysis included 1148 patients, of whom 501 had data at 6 months, 544 at
1 year, 331 at 2 years, and 247 at 3 years. Baseline adherence was 94.9% and
overall adherence was 93.1%. Forgetting was the most common reason for
missed doses. In the adjusted models, adherence was not associated with the
outcomes.ConclusionsHigher than expected adherence and a lack of association between adherence
and outcomes suggests patient reported adherence may not be reliable.
Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between
patient-reported adherence and relapses or new lesion formation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.