The measurement of bronchial reactivity is an important aid in the diagnosis of asthma, but the technique using spirometry is not feasible in young children. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a modification of the chest auscultation method in the assessment of bronchial reactivity to inhaled methacholine in young asthmatic children. One hundred forty-six young children with asthma (mean age, 4.3 yr) underwent bronchial challenges with nebulized methacholine using the auscultation method (PCW). The end point was defined as the appearance of wheezing, oxygen desaturation, or tachypnea. For comparison, 30 children and young adults with asthma underwent bronchial provocation with methacholine using spirometry (PC(20)). A positive response using the auscultation method was observed in 95.9% of the younger children, and wheezes alone or in combination with other signs appeared in 80.8% of them. The mean desaturation at the end point was 4.6% (PCW) and 5.0% (PC(20)), with a similar pattern in the two groups. Cough was not helpful in determining the end point. We conclude that the modified auscultation method is effective and safe, with wheeze appearing at the end point in the large majority of the children.

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has been used to diagnose asthma in adults and children using either the slow vital capacity method (SVCm) or, in younger children, the tidal breathing method (TBm). Adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) challenge also has been found to be a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of asthma. In the present study, we used the AMP provocation concentration that caused wheezing (PCW) to confirm the diagnosis of asthma (PCW < or = 200 mg/mL). We studied 36 children (2-7 years) with mild intermittent asthma, 13 children (3-7 years) with moderate persistent asthma treated with inhaled steroids, 20 nonasthmatic children (2-7 years) with chronic cough and recurrent pneumonia, and 15 healthy children (4-6 years). Expired gas was collected in collection bags by the TBm, and eNO was measured. We evaluated the efficacy of eNO values in diagnosing asthma. The mean eNO level of the mild intermittent asthmatic children (5.6 +/- 0.4 ppb) not receiving inhaled corticosteroids was significantly higher (ANOVA P < 0.0001) than that of the moderate persistent asthmatics who were treated with inhaled steroids, the nonasthmatic children with chronic cough, and the group of healthy children (3.7 +/- 0.6 ppb, P < 0.05; 3.2 +/- 0.3 ppb, P < 0.001; 2.2 +/- 0.2 ppb, P < 0.001, respectively). The points of intersection for sensitivity and specificity curves of eNO to differentiate mild intermittent asthmatics from nonasthmatic children with chronic cough and from healthy children were 77% and 88% for eNO values of 3.8 ppb and 2.9 ppb, respectively. We conclude that eNO collected by the TBm can differentiate steroid-naive young children with intermittent asthma from healthy children, from nonasthmatic children with chronic cough, and from asthmatic children treated with inhaled steroids.

No abstract

The value of home monitoring of peak expiratory flow (PEF) as part of an action plan for asthma management in children and young adults is uncertain. We sought to determine whether home recording of PEF benefited asthma management and whether any contribution was affected by the severity of the asthma.Twenty-eight children and young adults with asthma of different severity (mean age 14 yrs; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 12-16 yrs) recorded their symptoms, drug consumption and PEF twice daily for a mean of 82 days over a 12 week period, and attended the laboratory every 2 weeks for measurement of lung function.The number of individual patients with significant correlations for laboratory lung function tests compared with ambulatory PEF and diary scores averaged over the preceeding 2 weeks was low in all severity groups. When measured in the laboratory, PEF meter readings correlated poorly with PEF measured by spirometry. The proportion of patients with significant correlations for PEF, symptoms and rescue bronchodilator use on a day-to-day basis was 70-80% in the group of severe asthmatics and significantly less in the mild asthmatics. In a subgroup of 14 patients who were sick on a mean of 19 days, the mean difference in PEF between well and sick days was 14% of predicted. Diurnal PEF variation correlated poorly with other parameters in all groups.It is concluded that PEF monitoring adds little to daily recording of symptoms and bronchodilator use in the management of young patients with severe asthma, and it is too insensitive to register meaningful clinical changes in those with milder asthma.

We determined whether the exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) level in asthmatics is age-dependent. Eighty-seven asthmatic patients aged 2-41 years were studied. Hyperreactivity to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) was used to confirm asthma (