A case-control study was conducted in the greater Houston area to determine risk factors for late-onset group B streptococcus (GBS) disease (onset of disease or first positive culture between 7 and 180 days after birth). Characteristics of 122 case patients diagnosed during 1995-2000 were compared with control subjects matched for birth hospital and date of birth. Half the case patients were preterm infants, 84% of whom were born at <34 weeks of gestation. The risk for late-onset GBS disease increased by a factor of 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.56) for each week of decreasing gestation, by 3.70 (95% CI, 1.35-10.1) for infants of black mothers, and by 4.15 (95% CI, 1.27-13.60) for infants of mothers with a positive GBS screening. These risk factors are similar to that of early-onset GBS disease. However, prematurity is the major risk factor for late-onset GBS disease.
BACKGROUND:Indomethacin is the most frequently used pharmacological agent for closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in premature infants. However, reports of complications, particularly, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and isolated gastrointestinal perforation have generated concerns about the use of this medication.
OBJECTIVES:A retrospective study to compare the incidence of NEC, NEC-related gastrointestinal complications and isolated gastrointestinal perforation among premature infants treated for a PDA with either, indomethacin alone (I), surgical ligation alone (L), or indomethacin followed by surgical ligation (I-L).
METHODS:The medical records of 224 infants that underwent treatment, either pharmacological or surgical, for a PDA, confirmed by echocardiography, over a 4-year period (1995 to 1998) were analyzed. Treatment history and gastrointestinal complications were reviewed.
RESULTS:Of the 224 infants, 108 (48.2%) were treated with I, 50 (22.3%) by L, 66 (29.5%) with I-L. The clinical characteristics of the three treatment groups were similar and no differences in the incidence of NEC were observed between groups. NEC occurred in 14 (13%) of the I group, seven (14%) of the L group, and eight (12%) of the I-L group. The rate of NEC related gastrointestinal complications and isolated gastrointestinal perforation were also similar among groups.
CONCLUSION:In this large retrospective study, indomethacin treatment for a significant PDA in premature infants was not associated with a greater risk for NEC or NEC-related gastrointestinal complications than surgical ligation.
The objective of this study was to determine the rate of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure in premature infants using an adjustable indomethacin (INDO) dosing strategy, based on a second-dose peak plasma INDO level. We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of premature infants that were treated with INDO for a PDA, had a second dose peak plasma NDO levels, and followed predetermined guidelines for INDO dosing adjustments, over a 4-year period (1995 to 1998). Of 103 infants treated with the adjustable INDO dosing strategy, 66 (64%) achieved PDA closure whereas 37 (36%) did not. No differences in the second-dose peak plasma INDO levels (830 +/- 339 versus 702 +/- 381 ng/mL), day of life treatment was started (4 +/- 3 versus 4 +/- 2 days), or the number of doses of INDO received (4 +/- 1 versus 5 +/- 2 dose) were observed between responders and nonresponders. However, fourth-dose peak plasma INDO levels, which were available from 38 of 66 (57%) of the responders and 20 of 37 (54%) of the nonresponders, were lower in nonresponders (1553 +/- 413 versus 1829 +/- 609 ng/mL, p < 0.05). Patient demographics, including birth weight and gestational age, were similar between these groups. Using an adjustable INDO dosing strategy, based on a second-dose peak plasma INDO level and estimated plasma levels, PDA closure rates of 64% can be achieved. Although a clear relationship between INDO plasma levels and PDA closure was evident form this study, the rate of PDA closure in our study was lower than has been observed in studies with serial plasma INDO level monitoring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.