The purpose of this study was to compare DNA probe analyses to cultural methods for detecting three periodontal pathogens, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides intermedius, in human subgingival plaque. Subgingival sites from patients diagnosed as either healthy or showing evidence of gingivitis or juvenile or adult Periodontitis were sampled using two paper points. The number of these pathogens from one paper point was determined using microbiologic media and speciated by biochemical tests. Results were then compared to bacterial numbers obtained from the other paper point using species‐specific DNA probes. In 60 samples from the disease group, DNA probe analysis demonstrated 100% effectiveness in detecting A. actinomycetemcomitans and B. intermedius and 91% effectiveness in detecting B. gingivalis at culture positive levels (≥103 cells). In addition, probe assays frequently identified these pathogens in samples that were culture negative. Probe analysis revealed a better correlation between presence of a pathogen and clinical evidence of disease on an individual patient basis. In contrast, most samples taken from sites of healthy individuals showed undetectable levels of all three pathogens as determined by both techniques. These results suggest that DNA probe technology is at least equivalent and often superior to cultural methods for detecting A actinomycetemcomitans, B. gingivalis, and B. intermedius in human subgingival plaque samples.

The technology for hybridization of nucleic acids using isotopically labeled whole genomic or species‐specific cloned deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) probes for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides intermedius and Bacleroides gingivulis can be used to detect as few as 102 cells of these periodontal pathogens. The sensitivity and specificity of the test is not affected by the presence of 5x 10s unrelated bacteria in constructed mixed culture samples. Current feasibility tests with non‐isotopic reagents also give reliable and rapid detection of these oral pathogens in pure or mixed cultures. DNA probes should prove useful in a rapid, specific, and sensitive assay for these periodontal pathogens.

In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of whole genomic DNA probes for the periodontal pathogens Haemophilus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides intermedius, and Bacteroides gingivalis. By means of these probes, DNA hybridizations were performed against other organisms found in the oral cavity and organisms previously determined to be genetically similar. All three probes were sensitive to 10(3) cells for their respective organism. The H. actinomycetemcomitans probe cross-reacted with several haemophilus strains, Wolinella, and Campylobacter, indicating that H. actinomycetemcomitans-specific sequences would have to be identified and cloned for accurate detection of this organism in heterogeneous patient samples. Only very low levels of cross-reactivity were observed between the B. intermedius probe and representative black-pigmented Bacteroides. This low level of cross-reactivity did not interfere with the accurate identification of B. intermedius in sample evaluations. The B. gingivalis probe showed no cross-reactivity. Whole genomic probes will be used for the detection of B. intermedius and B. gingivalis in patient samples.

No abstract

No abstract