Background Pain in older persons with dementia is both under-detected and under-managed. Family caregivers can play an important role in addressing these deficiencies by communicating their care recipient’s symptoms and behaviors to medical providers, but little is known about how caregivers and providers approach pain-related discussions in the context of dementia. The goal of this study was to explore how ambulatory care providers and family caregivers of persons with dementia view pain communication. Methods In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with family caregivers ( n = 18) and healthcare providers involved in dementia care ( n = 16). Interviews focused on three specific content areas: (1) caregivers’ roles in communicating about pain in persons with dementia, (2) challenges experienced when communicating about pain in persons with dementia, and (3) strategies and recommendations for optimizing communication in this context. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method of data analysis. Results Caregivers and providers described various roles that caregivers assumed in communication processes, such as serving as historians, interpreters, and advocates. They identified two key features of problematic communication—receipt of inadequate information and interpersonal conflict about the care recipient’s pain—and articulated how ambiguity around pain and dementia, as well as preexisting beliefs and emotions, contributed to communication challenges. They also offered several suggestions to improve caregiver–provider communication processes, including the use of (1) written records to enhance the accuracy of caregivers’ reports and ensure that providers had specific information to inform symptom management and treatment plans, (2) pain scales and follow-up discussions to establish baseline data and clarify treatment recommendations, and (3) collaboration and rapport-building strategies to validate the caregivers’ contributions and maximize a team-based decision-making. Conclusion Receipt of inadequate information and interpersonal conflict are key challenges to caregiver–provider communication regarding pain in persons with dementia. Written records, pain scales, and rapport-building strategies may help to address these challenges.

Background Increasing complexity of treatment plans is associated with higher levels of caregiver burden in owners of dogs with skin disease. It is possible that elevated caregiver burden resulting from treatment complexity could, in turn, affect the veterinarian–client relationship. Hypotheses/Objectives We expected that treatment complexity, caregiver burden, and the client’s perception of the veterinarian–client relationship would be related to each other. We also expected an indirect effect of caregiver burden on the cross‐sectional association between treatment complexity and the veterinarian–client relationship, and that this effect would be robust to adjustment for the dog’s skin disease course and severity. Participants Participants were 349 owners of dogs with skin disease recruited through online consumer panels. Materials and methods Cross‐sectional online assessments were completed for caregiver burden, treatment plan complexity, veterinarian–client relationship, and skin disease course and severity. Demographic information also was collected. Results The indirect effect of caregiver burden on the relationship between treatment complexity and veterinarian–client relationship was statistically significant, accounting for 42.76% of the variance in the model. After controlling for disease severity and course, that effect remained statistically significant, accounting for 37.76% of the variance. Conclusions and clinical importance Findings support the notion that greater treatment complexity is related to the owner’s perception of the veterinarian–client relationship via caregiver burden. Efforts to reduce caregiver burden by using the simplest effective treatment may benefit the veterinarian–client relationship.

Background Agitation is a common symptom in dementia and linked to caregiver burden, but both agitation and burden are multidimensional constructs. The current study sought to determine whether specific presentations of agitation differentially relate to aspects of caregiver burden. Methods Medical record data from an outpatient memory clinic were extracted for 609 persons with dementia, including caregiver‐reported burden and care recipient agitation. Results Exploratory factor analysis yielded three domains of agitation on the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (‘Physically Aggressive’, ‘Physically Non‐Aggressive’, ‘Verbally Agitated’) and four domains of burden on the Zarit Burden Interview (‘Impact on Life’, ‘Guilt/Uncertainty’, ‘Embarrassment/Frustration’, ‘Overwhelm’). Regression analyses demonstrated all domains of agitation positively predicted overall burden. Regarding specific aspects of burden, Physically Aggressive behaviours predicted Embarrassment/Frustration. Physically Non‐Aggressive behaviours predicted Impact on Life and Guilt/Uncertainty. Verbally Agitated behaviours predicted all burden dimensions. Conclusions Results suggest specific aspects of agitation may differentially contribute to facets of caregiver burden.

No abstract

Objectives Caregiver burden has been found in owners of seriously ill pets; however, research to date has been heavily represented by dog owners. Prior caregiver burden work has neither intentionally focused on cat owners nor been appropriately powered to examine differences in owners of cats relative to owners of dogs. We expected that owners of an ill cat would exhibit greater caregiver burden than owners of a healthy cat but lower burden than owners of an ill dog. Methods A cross-sectional online assessment of caregiver burden was completed by 1085 pet owners through a pet demographic audience platform, including 333 owners reporting on a cat with current illness, 492 owners of a healthy cat and 260 owners of dogs with a current illness. Results Owners of an ill cat, examined across all illnesses represented, had greater burden ( P <0.001) than the owners of a healthy cat and somewhat lower burden ( P = 0.013) than owners of an ill dog. Conclusions and relevance Caregiver burden is present in owners of an ill cat and may differ from that of dog owners. Future work is needed to determine the reasons underlying this difference between species. Given that restricted sample sizes precluded examination across specific conditions, it will also be important to determine whether particular diseases yield greater burden in cat owners relative to dog owners.