Introduction: Repeated procedures are often needed for long-term success of atrial fibrillation ablation. There are scarce data regarding cryoballoon use for such procedure. Methods and Results:We analyzed acute effect and long-term follow-up of secondgeneration cryoballoon ablation, performed as a repeat procedure after an index radiofrequency vs cryoballoon ablation. Sixty-one patients from three centers were included. In 36 cases radiofrequency (RF-I) and in 25 cryoballoon ablation (CB-I) was the index procedure. During redo procedure, pulmonary vein reconnection was less frequent in CB-I vs RF-I (51.5% vs 66.9%; P = 0.017). After cryoballoon, left inferior (P = 0.027) and right superior (P = 0.06) pulmonary veins were less likely to exhibit reconnection. Moreover, patients after initial RF ablation frequently presented multiple-vein reconnection (P = 0.018), while patients after cryoablation more often had only one vein reconnected (P = 0.008).During reablation procedures, all 149 reconnected veins in both groups were isolated, with no differences in procedural parameters, except for procedure time, shorter in CB-I group (65.5 vs 71.1 minutes; P = 0.04). Transient phrenic nerve palsy was the only complication in both groups (5.6% and 8.0%; ns). After mean follow-up of 15 ± 9 months, 70.3% of patients were free from atrial fibrillation (AF), with no differences between the groups (P = 0.71). In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the persistent form of arrhythmia (P = 0.009) and relapse in the blanking period (P = 0.0004) were the only independent predictors of AF recurrence. Conclusions:The use of second-generation cryoballoon is associated with less frequent pulmonary vein reconnection compared with RF ablation. Cryoballoon is safe and effective for repeated AF ablation, regardless of the technique used for the initial procedure. K E Y W O R D S atrial fibrillation, cryoballoon ablation, pulmonary vein reconnection, redo ablation

No abstract

No abstract

This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Cardiology Journal" are listed in PubMed.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a routine treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF). Single-shot techniques were introduced to simplify the procedure. We analyzed time-dependent changes in procedural parameters, acute success, complication rates, and long-term outcomes during our initial experience with multipolar phased-radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Methods and Results: The first 126 consecutive patients (98 male; age: 58.8 ± 8.7 years) who underwent PVI with phased-RF ablation at our center were included in the study. Procedural parameters, complication rate, acute success and 12-month efficacy were compared in the first, second and third group of 42 consecutive patients. In all patients, 516/526 PVs were effectively isolated (98.1%), with no differences between the tierces (p = 0.67). Procedure (169.8 vs. 132.9 vs. 105.8 min, p < 0.0001), fluoroscopy (32.9 vs. 24.3 vs. 14.1 min, p < 0.0001) and left atrial dwell (83.0 vs. 61.9 vs. 51.4 min, p < 0.0001) times were significantly reduced with experience in tierces 1–3, respectively. In the 12-month follow-up, 60.3% of patients were arrhythmia-free with no differences between the tierces (p = 0.88). In multivariate analysis, the relapse in the blanking period (p < 0.0001), time from AF diagnosis (p = 0.004) and left atrial diameter (p = 0.012) were the only independent predictors of AF recurrence. Conclusions: The learning curve effect was demonstrated in procedural parameters, but not in the complication rate nor the long-term success of PVI with phased-RF technique. The relapse in the blanking period was the strongest predictor of treatment failure in long-time observation.