Circulating adiponectin levels are lower in individuals with increased BMI and central adiposity. However, they are paradoxically higher in those with peripheral adiposity. We hypothesized that adiponectin secretion from central and peripheral adipose tissue depots may be associated with adiposity levels and its distribution. A total of 55 subjects (69% women) undergoing elective abdominal surgery (mean age: 53 ± 13 years) were recruited. Health history, anthropometrics, and cardiovascular disease risk factor measurements were obtained. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) samples were obtained and cultured. Media was collected after 24hr and adiponectin released into the medium was measured using ELISA. We found that mean adiponectin levels from SAT and VAT in all subjects were 17.14±15.27 vs. 15.21±14.28 pg/ml/mg of tissue respectively (p = ns). However, adiponectin secretion from VAT correlated negatively with BMI (r = -0.31, p = 0.01), whereas there was no relationship with SAT (r = 0.08 p = 0.61). Similarly, waist circumference and estimated VAT percentage were both negatively correlated with VAT secretion of adiponectin (r = -0.35, p = 0.01 and r = -0.36, p = 0.02 respectively). These negative correlations were significant only in women on gender-stratified analyses. Adiponectin secretion from VAT decreases with increases in adiposity, while SAT secretion remains unchanged, especially in women. This observation may explain lower circulating adiponectin levels in individuals with central obesity. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanism behind this discrepant adiponectin secretion from SAT and VAT with increases in BMI, particularly among women.

No abstract

BackgroundInfertility treatment decisions require people to balance multiple priorities. Within couples, partners must also negotiate priorities with one another. In this study, we assessed the family-building priorities of couples prior to their first consultations with a reproductive specialist.MethodsParticipants were couples who had upcoming first consultations with a reproductive specialist (N = 59 couples (59 women; 59 men)). Prior to the consultation, couples separately completed the Family-Building Priorities Tool, which tasked them with ranking from least to most important 10 factors associated with family building. We describe the highest (top three) and lowest (bottom three) priorities, the alignment of priorities within couples, and test for differences in prioritization between men and women within couples (Wilcoxon signed rank test).ResultsMaintaining a close and satisfying relationship with one’s partner was ranked as a high priority by majorities of men and women, and in 25% of couples, both partners ranked this factor as their most important priority for family building. Majorities of men and women also ranked building a family in a way that does not make infertility obvious to others as a low priority, and in 27% of couples, both partners ranked this factor as the least important priority for family building. There were also differences within couples that involved either men or women ranking a particular goal more highly than their partners. More women ranked two factors higher than did their partners: 1) that I become a parent one way or another (p = 0.015) and 2) that I have a child in the next year or two (p < 0.001), whereas more men ranked 4 factors higher than their partners: 1) that our child has [woman’s] genes (p = 0.025), 2) that our child has [man’s] genes (p < 0.001), 3) that I maintain a close relationship with my partner (p = 0.034), and 4) that I avoid side effects from treatment (p < 0.001).ConclusionsClinicians who support patients in assessing available family-building paths should be aware that: (1) patients balance multiple priorities as a part of, or beside, becoming a parent; and (2) patients and their partners may not be aligned in their prioritization of achieving parenthood. For infertility patients who are in relationships, clinicians should encourage the active participation of both partners as well as frank discussions about each partner’s priorities for building their family.

No abstract