ObjectiveAim of this study was to analyze whether children with objectively measured second‐hand cigarette smoke (SHS) exposure suffer from a more severe course of disease when hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).MethodsThis prospective study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelminen‐Hospital, Vienna, Austria in children aged below 1 year without a history of preceding lung disease and with acute symptoms of LRTI and a positive nasopharyngeal swab for RSV. On admission, urinary cotinine was measured as a marker of recent SHS and clinical severity of LRTI was assessed by oxygen saturation SpO2 and the “admission clinical severity score” (CSSA). Parents/caregivers were asked to complete a customized questionnaire assessing risks for SHS and demographic characteristics.ResultsAfter inclusion of 217 patients, data of 185 patients with a mean (SD) age of 106 days (80) were analyzed. Twenty‐five patients (13.5%) were “cotinine‐positive” (COT+) defined as a urinary cotinine level of ≥7 μg/L. SpO2 on admission was significantly lower in children recently exposed to SHS defined objectively by COT+ (94.8%  ±2.0) in urine on admission compared to children not recently exposed (COT−) (96.8% ±3.0; P < 0.01). Disease severity, assessed via mean clinical severity score on admission (CSSA) for COT+ and COT− was 2.56 and 1.71, respectively (P = 0.03).ConclusionsRecent exposure to SHS was associated with lower O2 saturation and higher clinical severity score, measured by urine cotinine levels in children hospitalized for RSV infection under 1 year of age.

Background Nocturnal cough and wheeze are important symptoms when diagnosing any respiratory disease in a child, but objective measurements of these symptoms are not performed. Methods The aim of our study was to analyze the use of an automated detection system to assess breath sounds objectively in comparison to cough and wheeze questionnaires and to evaluate its feasibility in clinical practice. Results Forty-nine recordings of thirty-nine children were processed (asthma n = 13; cystic fibrosis n = 2; pneumonia n = 5; suspicion of habit cough n = 7; prolonged, recurrent or chronic cough n = 13), and cough and asthma scores were compared to the objective nocturnal recordings. Time for audio-validation of recordings took between 2 and 40 min (mean: 14.22 min, (SD): 10.72). Accuracy of the automated measurement was higher for cough than for wheezing sounds. Nocturnal cough readings but not wheeze readings correlated with some of the corresponding scores. Conclusion To our knowledge this is the first study using a new device to assess nocturnal cough and obstructive breath sounds objectively in children with a wide variety of respiratory diseases. The assessment proved user friendly. We obtained additional information on nighttime symptoms, which would otherwise have remained obscure. Further studies to assess possible diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of this device are needed.

No abstract