The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol is a structured professional judgement (SPJ) tool that aids risk assessment of sexual violence. It is widely used internationally. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical practice of SPJ risk assessment and risk management through qualitative analysis of the accounts of users of these assessments. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of 31 criminal justice professionals in southeast Scotland. The participants' accounts were explored using the framework method. Five themes emerged from this analysis: informing risk management; confirming what was known and giving weight; understanding personality; treatment; and the usefulness and limitations of risk assessment. The participants reported that the assessments were influential with respect to risk management. The study revealed some important implications for service development. The authors suggest possible future use of the framework method in research investigating the risk assessment of sexual violence.

SummaryThis article covers what clinicians need to know before undertaking a risk assessment of a sexual offender. It discusses general information about sexual offenders (characteristics, aetiological models, recidivism rates and legal responses); the association between mental disorders and sexual offending; risk and protective factors; and risk assessment tools.

SummaryThis article focuses on how to assess and manage risk in sexual offenders. It covers assessment issues, including interviews, taking a sexual history, assessing sexual deviance and assessing personality. The key step of case formulation is outlined and the development of risk management strategies, including monitoring, supervision and treatment, is described.

No abstract