“…So, one might assume that the GFV paradigm and its pragmatic branch, threat assessment and management, are irrelevant to sexual violence and vice versa. So much has been written about risk assessment and management with those who commit sexual offenses ( Davis and Ogloff, 2008 ; Darjee and Russell, 2012 ; Russell and Darjee, 2013 ; Craig and Rettenberger, 2016 ; Kemshall, 2017 ; Helmus, 2018 ; Levenson, 2018 ; Brankley et al, 2021 ; Raymond et al, 2021 ), and although threat and risk assessment and management overlap ( Meloy et al, 2021 ), and some behaviors manage to sit across both camps (e.g., stalking and intimate partner violence), many behaviors seem to fall in one or other, and sexual offending practice is squarely in the risk one. Traditionally with sexual offending the emphasis has been on preventing recurrence after an offense has occurred, rather than preventing an offense in someone with concerning thoughts or behavior.…”