The treatment of patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the discovery of druggable mutations. ROS1 (c-ros oncogene) is one gene with druggable mutations in NSCLC. ROS1 is currently targeted by several specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but only two of these, crizotinib and entrectinib, have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Crizotinib is a low molecular weight, orally available TKI that inhibits ROS1, MET and ALK and is considered the gold standard first-line treatment with demonstrated significant activity for lung cancers harbouring ROS1 gene rearrangements. However, crizotinib resistance often occurs, making the treatment of ROS1-positive lung cancers more challenging. A great effort has been undertaken to identify a new generation or ROS1 inhibitors. In this review, we briefly introduce the biology and role of ROS1 in lung cancer and discuss the underlying acquired mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib and the promising new agents able to overcome resistance mechanisms and offer alternative efficient therapies.

No abstract

This study emphasizes that both antifibrotic drugs appeared to be a good therapeutic choice in terms of functional stabilization, also in older patients.

The symptom of breathlessness is an important outcome measure in the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Clinical ratings of dyspnea and routine lung function are weakly related to each other. However, in the clinical setting breathlessness in COPD is encountered under conditions of increased respiratory effort, impeded respiratory muscle action, or functional weakness. Thus, the present study was carried out to determine whether and to what extent clinical ratings of dyspnea and respiratory muscle dysfunction relate to each other. In 21 patients with COPD two methods were used to rate dyspnea: a modified Medical Research Council Scale (MRC) and the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI), which is a multidimensional instrument for measuring dyspnea based on three components: magnitude of task, magnitude of effort, and functional impairment. A baseline focal score was obtained as the sum of the three components. Measures were: pulmonary volumes; arterial blood gases; maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV); maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP, respectively); and breathing patterns ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), and respiratory frequency (Rf). In 15 patients pleural pressure was also measured during both quiet breathing (Pplsw) and maximal inspiratory sniff maneuver at FRC (Pplsn). BDI and MRC ratings related to each other and showed comparable weak associations with standard parameters (FEV1, PaCO2, VT), MIP, and MEP. In contrast, MVV closely and similarly related to both ratings. Pplsw (%Pplsn), a measure of respiratory effort, and Pplsw (%Pplsn)/VT(%VC), an index of neuroventilatory dissociation, related significantly to both the BDI (r2 = -0.77 and r2 = -0.75, respectively) and the MRC (r2 = 0.81 and r2 = 0.74, respectively). Using MVV, Pplsw (%Pplsn), and Pplsw (%Pplsn)/VT(%VC) in a stepwise multiple regression as independent variables with BDI rating as dependent variable, MVV explained an additional 14.5% of the variance of the BDI over the 67.8% predicted by Pplsw (%Pplsn). Our results demonstrate that the level of chronic exertional dyspnea in COPD increases as the ventilatory muscle derangement increases. The level of the relationships among dyspnea ratings and MVV and respiratory effort helps to explain some of the mechanisms of chronic dyspnea of COPD. These measures should be considered for therapeutic intervention to reduce dyspnea.

No abstract