Synthetic cannabinoid (SC) designer drugs based on indole and indazole scaffolds and featuring l-valinamide or l-tert-leucinamide side chains are encountered with increasing frequency by forensic researchers and law enforcement agencies and are associated with serious adverse health effects. However, many of these novel SCs are unprecedented in the scientific literature at the time of their discovery, and little is known of their pharmacology. Here, we report the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of AB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, AB-PINACA, ADB-PINACA, 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-ADB-PINACA, ADBICA, 5F-ADBICA, and several analogues. All synthesized SCs acted as high potency agonists of CB1 (EC50 = 0.24-21 nM) and CB2 (EC50 = 0.88-15 nM) receptors in a fluorometric assay of membrane potential, with 5F-ADB-PINACA showing the greatest potency at CB1 receptors. The cannabimimetic activities of AB-FUBINACA and AB-PINACA in vivo were evaluated in rats using biotelemetry. AB-FUBINACA and AB-PINACA dose-dependently induced hypothermia and bradycardia at doses of 0.3-3 mg/kg, and hypothermia was reversed by pretreatment with a CB1 (but not CB2) antagonist, indicating that these SCs are cannabimimetic in vivo, consistent with anecdotal reports of psychoactivity in humans.

Background: The dissemination and adoption of research into clinical practice in health care settings is a complex and challenging process. Clinical champions have been increasingly used in health care to facilitate the implementation and adoption of evidence-based practice and to overcome organizational barriers. In relation to substance use and mental health disorders, translation of new evidence into practice is an ongoing challenge. The utilization of a clinical champion to motivate staff to implement evidence-based practice in these settings may improve treatment quality and reduce the burden of disease. We thus aimed to conduct a systematic review to examine the role and efficacy of clinical champions in the drug and alcohol and mental health settings. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search (1980-present) using the following databases: PubMed and PsycINFO. Additional studies were identified using reference searches of relevant reviews. Results: Thirteen separate studies were included in the final review. Clinical champions were typically selected rather than emergent, including clinical staff members engaging in a professional clinical role (e.g., physicians, psychologists, social workers). Training provided for these roles was often not stated. Clinical champions assisted with faster initiation and persistence in the application of novel interventions, facilitating overcoming system barriers, and enhanced staff engagement and motivation. Conclusions: In the substance use and mental health field, clinical champions appear to be an important component to facilitating practice changes. Future studies should provide specific details regarding attributes and training and also examine the relevant combination of personal characteristics and training sufficient to facilitate implementation of evidence-based practice in drug and alcohol and mental health settings. Plain language abstract Treatment delivery in drug and alcohol and mental health settings may not always be based on best available evidence. Organizational context and individual factors are important in determining whether new practices will be adopted. Passive approaches such as websites or treatment manuals do not necessarily lead to change in practice. The clinical champion model has been shown to be effective in aiding implementation of evidence-based practice in health care settings. However, there is limited evidence evaluating its use in drug and alcohol and mental health settings. The current review aims to synthesize and evaluate the use of clinical champions in implementation research in drug and alcohol and mental health settings. We found that clinical champions were typically clinical staff members engaging in a professional clinical role. Training provided for these roles was often limited. Clinical champions may assist with faster initiation and persistence in the application of novel interventions, facilitating overcoming system barriers, and enhanced staff engagement and motivation.

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with rapid subclonal diversification, harboring molecular abnormalities that vary temporo-spatially, a contributor to therapy resistance. Fluorescence guided neurosurgical resection utilizes administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5ALA) generating individually fluorescent tumor cells within a background population of non-neoplastic cells in the invasive tumor region. The aim of the study was to specifically isolate and interrogate the invasive GBM cell population using a novel 5ALA based method. Methods We have isolated the critical invasive GBM cell population by developing 5ALA-based metabolic fluorescence activated cell sorting. This allows purification and study of invasive cells from GBM without an overwhelming background “normal brain” signal to confound data. The population was studied using RNAseq, rtPCR and immunohistochemistry, with gene targets functionally interrogated on proliferation and migration assays using siRNA knockdown and known drug inhibitors. Results RNAseq analysis identifies specific genes such as SERPINE1 which is highly expressed in invasive GBM cells but at low levels in the surrounding normal brain parenchyma. siRNA knockdown and pharmacological inhibition with specific inhibitors of SERPINE1 reduced the capacity of GBM cells to invade in an in vitro assay. Rodent xenografts of 5ALA positive cells were established and serially transplanted, confirming tumorigenicity of the fluorescent patient derived cells but not the 5ALA negative cells. Conclusions Identification of unique molecular features in the invasive GBM population offer hope for developing more efficacious targeted therapies compared to targeting the tumor core and for isolating tumor sub-populations based upon intrinsic metabolic properties.

The effect of modifying dietary LA and ALA intakes on omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 LCPUFA) status in human adults: a systematic review and commentary