Aims.  Within a gynaecological surgical setting to identify the patterns and frequency of anxiety pre‐ and postoperatively; to identify any correlation between raised anxiety levels and postoperative pain; to identify events, from the patients’ perspective, that may increase or decrease anxiety in the pre‐ and postoperative periods. Background.  It is well documented that surgery is associated with increased anxiety, which has an adverse impact on patient outcomes. Few studies have been conducted to obtain the patient's perspective on the experience of anxiety and the events and situations that aggravate and ameliorate it. Method.  The study used a mixed method approach. The sample consisted of women undergoing planned gynaecological surgery. Anxiety was assessed using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Trait anxiety was measured at the time of recruitment. State anxiety was then assessed at six time points during the pre‐ and postoperative periods. Postoperative pain was also measured using a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Taped semi‐structured telephone interviews were conducted approximately a week after discharge. Results.  State anxiety rose steadily from the night before surgery to the point of leaving the ward to go to theatre. Anxiety then increased sharply prior to the anaesthetic decreasing sharply afterwards. Patients with higher levels of trait anxiety were more likely to experience higher levels of anxiety throughout their admission. Elevated levels of pre‐ and postoperative anxiety were associated with increased levels of postoperative pain. Telephone interviews revealed a range of events/situations that patients recalled distressing them and many were related to inadequate information. Conclusion.  This study found higher rates of anxiety than previously reported and anxiety levels appeared raised before admission to hospital. This has important clinical and research implications. Relevance to clinical practice.  Patients with high levels of anxiety may be identified preoperatively and interventions designed to reduce anxiety could be targeted to this vulnerable group. Patient experiences can inform the delivery of services to meet their health needs better.

Our estimates suggest prevalence of severe hypoglycaemia attended by the emergency services is high in younger age groups and lower for older age groups, although the absolute numbers of severe events in older age groups contribute substantially to the overall costs of providing emergency assistance for hypoglycaemia.

A collaborative project between a district hospital and a local university resulted in a senior lecturer being seconded 2 days per week to facilitate the continued improvement in pain management. The rationale for this collaboration was to explore the utilization of innovative teaching methods to deliver education in practice and to develop further research in relation to pain management. An interprofessional pain steering group (IPSG) was established with representation from several services (acute pain, chronic pain, palliative care, physiotherapy, etc.). This group identified several objectives, one of which related to the improvement of pain management through interprofessional education based on the findings from previous audit work. This paper reports on the provision of interprofessional education in pain management and on the evaluation of the impact of this on patient outcomes and practitioner learning. The successes and challenges of this endeavour are discussed.

Purpose -That patients should be able to receive a copy of any letter written about them is part of the British Government's policy to increase patients' involvement in their care and treatment. All National Health Service (NHS) organisations are expected to implement this by April 2005. This paper aims to describe how one acute Trust has used basic change management principles to implement the initiative. Design/methodology/approach -Examines the approach of the Salisbury Health Care NHS Trust, where initially a survey of all consultants, senior nurses and allied health professionals was carried out. Findings -Initial concerns that patients would not understand the letter were generally unfounded with 98.9 per cent of patients saying that they understood their letter. Of patients, 96.9 per cent said that they found receiving a copy letter useful. Originality/value -The research demonstrated a high percentage of patients wanting a copy letter, which has huge resource implications in terms of secretarial time, additional stationery and postage costs. Change is difficult and an emotionally charged issue however, using examples of good practice and taking a multi-faceted approach to the change process the initiative has been successfully implemented.

SummaryThis re-survey of neurosurgical centres was conducted to determine whether the publication of management guidelines has resulted in changes in the intensive care management of severely headinjured patients (defined as Glasgow Coma Score , 9) in the UK and Ireland. Results were compared with data collected from a similar survey conducted 2 years earlier. Almost 75% of centres monitor intracranial pressure in the majority of patients and 80% now set a target cerebral perfusion pressure of . 70 mmHg. The use of prolonged hyperventilation (. 12 h) is declining and the target P a co 2 is now most commonly . 4 kPa. More centres maintain core temperature , 36.5 8C. Although wide variations in the management of severely head-injured patients still exist, we found evidence of practice changing to comply with published guidelines. In surveys carried out 2 years ago, we highlighted the wide variation in the intensive care management of severely head-injured patients [defined as Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) , 9] in neurosurgical centres throughout the UK and Ireland [1, 2]. Since these initial surveys, two expert bodies have produced guidelines for the management of severe head injury [3, 4]. We surveyed neurosurgical centres to examine whether the management of severely head-injured patients had changed following publication of these guidelines. MethodsThe directors of 44 neurosurgical centres in the UK and Ireland were asked to complete a questionnaire identical to that used 2 years earlier. After 4 weeks, a copy of the questionnaire was sent to all non-responders with a covering letter urging them to reply. The data collected in this survey were compared with results obtained 2 years ago using a Chi-squared test. The significance level was set at 0.05 and statistical analysis was performed using statview 4.0 (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA). ResultsAll 44 centres replied, but four of these did not treat severely head-injured patients and so were not analysed further. Compared with 1996, a greater proportion of units had dedicated junior staff (87 vs. 66%; Chisquared 13, d.f. 1, p , 0.05) and identifiable high-dependency unit (HDU) facilities (68 vs. 43%; Chi-squared 17, d.f. 1, p , 0.05). Only 54% of units had a written protocol for the management of raised intracranial pressure. The changes in management that we observed between the two survey periods are listed in Tables 1±3. DiscussionRecent guidelines [3, 4] suggest monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in all patients with a GCS , 9 or an abnormal computed tomography scan. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) should be maintained . 90 mmHg and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) . 70 mmHg. Intracranial hypertension should be treated when ICP is . 25 mmHg. The guidelines advise against severe or prolonged hyperventilation and found no evidence to support the use of steroids in head injury. The availability of these guidelines appears to have altered ICU care for severely head-injured patients.Organisational changes in admission practice, unit staffing and HDU bed...