Background While it is generally accepted that cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) plays an important role in atrial fibrillation (AF) and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency catheter ablation modifies the ganglionated plexi (GP), the alterations of CANS after PVI are not clarified. Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate the alteration of CANS after conventional cryoballoon ablation (CBA) by using a non-invasive examination method of measuring resting heart rate (R-HR) and coefficient of variation of R-R interval (CVR-R) which is a representative parameter of heart rate viability. CVR-R reflects R-R interval variation affected by respiration. It is calculated from the R-R interval of consecutive 100 heart beats of sinus rhythm recorded at rest. Declines of CVR-R indicate the parasympathetic dysfunction and the normal range of it varies depend on the age. As age increases from 30s to 70s, the average value of CVR-R decreases from 4.0% to 2.4%. Methods Consecutive patients of paroxysmal AF treated with initial CBA in our institute participated. Subjects were limited to the patients who maintained sinus rhythm through the study and whose prescription had not been changed after procedure. All patients recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram to measure R-HR and CVR-R before and the day after the procedure. We compared R-HR and CVR-R of all patients before and after CBA. And in addition, we compared them in each of two groups whose pre-procedural H-RH were under 50 bpm (Group-U50) and over 70 bpm (Group-O70). All procedures were performed with second generation 28mm cryoballoon (CB)s under the conscious sedation with Dexmedetomidine. CB temperature was down to a minimum of -60°C and target application time was 180 seconds. Results In the procedure of all 105 patients (male gender, 54%; age, 66.9 ± 10.4years; CHADS2score, 1.15 ± 1.04; diabetes mellitus,14%; beta-blocker therapy, 16%), 1 of touch-up for PVI, 6 of supra vena cava isolation and 21 of cavotricuspid isthmus linear ablations with radiofrequency catheter were added. In all patients, R-HR increased from 58.9 ± 9.2bpm to 72.4 ± 9.5bpm (P < 0.01) and CVR-R decreased from 2.36 ± 1.08% to 1.24 ± 0.68% (P < 0.01), respectively. In Group-U50 (n = 14; male gender 64%; age 67.6 ± 12.4 years), R-HR increased from 47.1 ± 2.1bpm to 64.4 ± 7.9bpm (P < 0.01) and CVR-R decreased from 2.58 ± 1.59% to 1.34 ± 0.82% (P < 0.01), respectively. In Group-O70 (n = 17; male gender 43%; age 67.4 ± 12.6 years), R-HR increased from 73.7 ± 2.8bpm to 81.8 ± 7.4bpm (P < 0.01) and CVR-R decreased from 2.33 ± 0.94% to 1.14 ± 0.52% (P < 0.01), respectively. Values of CVR-R before and after CBA showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions After CBA, R-HR increment and CVR-R decrement were significantly observed. CVR-R was halved regardless of pre–procedural R-HR. Damages to GP by CBA would be reflected as denervation of vagus nerves in CANS. R-HR increase might be associated with parasympathetic suppression of CANS.
To evaluate the effects of antihypertensive agents on Captopril (12.5 mg) twice daily (n = 15) produced a mild reduction in BP with little change in the circadian patthe circadian blood pressure (BP) of patients with previous brain infarction, the ambulatory BP was measured tern. The slow-release nifedipine group had the greatest decrease in mean systolic and diastolic BP. The heart non-invasively for 24 h before and after administration of antihypertensive agents. One hundred milligrams of rate significantly increased after administration of slowrelease nifedipine and decreased after administration of acebutolol twice daily (n = 15) is effective in lowering the BP during the daytime, but has little effect during acebutolol. To reduce stroke recurrence, we should consider the effects of antihypertensive agents on circadian the night and the morning. Twenty milligrams of slowrelease nifedipine twice daily (n = 14) produced a con-BP in hypertensive patients with previous brain infarction. sistent reduction in the BP over the entire 24-h period and effectively blunted the rise in BP in the morning.
Background Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was developed as a “nutrition-related” risk index and was reported in different populations as associated with the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the associations of GNRI with mortality and amputation free survival in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods From January 2011 to June 2016, 295 consecutive patients (73.3±9.2 years; 75.6% male) with PAD undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in our hospital were retrospectively examined. The GNRI on admission was calculated as follows: 14.89 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 41.7 × body mass index (BMI)/22. Characteristics and mortality were compared between 2 groups: low GNRI (<92, n=110) with moderate or severe nutritional risk; and high GNRI (≥92, n=185) with no or low nutritional risk. Results The median follow up period was 39.4±26.4months. There were 85 deaths (28.8%) and 13 major amputation (4.4%) during the follow-up. Patients in the low-GNRI group were more often higher age, non-ambulatory state, hemodialysis and critical limb ischemia. BMI, serum hemoglobin, albumin, low-density lipoprotein were significantly lower, whereas serum C-reactive protein was significantly higher in the low-GNRI group than the high-GNRI group (P<0.05, respectively). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients in the low-GNRI group had a significantly lower amputation free survival, compared to those in the high-GNRI group (log-rank test, P<0.001). Conclusion The low GNRI is associated with an increased risk of mortality and limb events in patients with PAD. Amputation-free survival (Kaplan-Meier) Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.