Advances in biomaterials for drug delivery are enabling significant progress in biology and medicine. Multidisciplinary collaborations between physical scientists, engineers, biologists, and clinicians generate innovative strategies and materials to treat a range of diseases. Specifically, recent advances include major breakthroughs in materials for cancer immunotherapy, autoimmune diseases, and genome editing. Here, strategies for the design and implementation of biomaterials for drug delivery are reviewed. A brief history of the biomaterials field is first established, and then commentary on RNA delivery, responsive materials development, and immunomodulation are provided. Current challenges associated with these areas as well as opportunities to address long-standing problems in biology and medicine are discussed throughout.

Hematin crystallization is the primary mechanism of heme detoxification in malaria parasites and the target of the quinoline class of antimalarials. Despite numerous studies of malaria pathophysiology, fundamental questions regarding hematin growth and inhibition remain. Among them are the identity of the crystallization medium in vivo, aqueous or organic; the mechanism of crystallization, classical or nonclassical; and whether quinoline antimalarials inhibit crystallization by sequestering hematin in the solution, or by blocking surface sites crucial for growth. Here we use time-resolved in situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) and show that the lipid subphase in the parasite may be a preferred growth medium. We provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence of the molecular mechanisms of hematin crystallization and inhibition by chloroquine, a common quinoline antimalarial drug. AFM observations demonstrate that crystallization strictly follows a classical mechanism wherein new crystal layers are generated by 2D nucleation and grow by the attachment of solute molecules. We identify four classes of surface sites available for binding of potential drugs and propose respective mechanisms of drug action. Further studies reveal that chloroquine inhibits hematin crystallization by binding to molecularly flat {100} surfaces. A 2-μM concentration of chloroquine fully arrests layer generation and step advancement, which is ∼10 4 × less than hematin's physiological concentration. Our results suggest that adsorption at specific growth sites may be a general mode of hemozoin growth inhibition for the quinoline antimalarials. Because the atomic structures of the identified sites are known, this insight could advance the future design and/or optimization of new antimalarials. malaria parasites | heme detoxification | crystallization mechanisms | chloroquine | crystal growth inhibition

In malaria pathophysiology, divergent hypotheses on the inhibition of hematin crystallization posit that drugs act either by the sequestration of soluble hematin or their interaction with crystal surfaces. We use physiologically relevant, time-resolved in situ surface observations and show that quinoline antimalarials inhibit β-hematin crystal surfaces by three distinct modes of action: step pinning, kink blocking, and step bunch induction. Detailed experimental evidence of kink blocking validates classical theory and demonstrates that this mechanism is not the most effective inhibition pathway. Quinolines also form various complexes with soluble hematin, but complexation is insufficient to suppress heme detoxification and is a poor indicator of drug specificity. Collectively, our findings reveal the significance of drug-crystal interactions and open avenues for rationally designing antimalarial compounds.

Implantable medical devices have revolutionized modern medicine. However, immune-mediated foreign body response (FBR) to the materials of these devices can limit their function or even induce failure. Here we describe long-term controlled release formulations for local antiinflammatory release through the development of compact, solvent-free crystals. The compact lattice structure of these crystals allows for very slow, surface dissolution and high drug density. These formulations suppress FBR in both rodents and non-human primates for at least 1.3 years and 6 months, respectively. Formulations inhibited fibrosis across multiple implant sitessubcutaneous, intraperitoneal and intramuscular. In particular incorporation of GW2580, a Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1R) inhibitor, into a range of devices including human islet microencapsulation systems, electrode-based continuous glucose-sensing monitors and musclestimulating devices, inhibits fibrosis, thereby allowing for extended function. We believe that local, long-term controlled release with the crystal formulations described here enhances and extends function in a range of medical devices and provides a generalized solution to the local immune response to implanted biomaterials. Implanted biomedical devices are an integral part of modern therapeutics, playing key roles in many clinical applications including neural interfacing 1 , monitoring vital signs 2 , pacemakers 3 , controlled drug release 4 , scaffolds for tissue reconstruction 5 , vascular stenting, cell encapsulation and transplantation 6. While the immunological response to materials can be therapeutic, for example with particulate vaccines 7 , some device materials, including polysaccharides, polymers, ceramics, and metals 8 , can induce host immune-mediated foreign body and rejection responses This response can lead to fibrotic encapsulation, and in some cases, reduced efficacy or failure 8-12. Current approaches for long-term maintenance of biomedical device implant biocompatibility often involve broad-spectrum antiinflammatories 13. Short-term steroid or anti-fibrotic drug delivery can transiently inhibit inflammatory cell recruitment as well as improve protein secretion of immuno-isolated cellular grafts 14,15. However, many anti-inflammatory drugs have multiple targets and differential effects in vivo, and associated toxicity 13,16. In particular, macrophages are known to be key mediators of the immune response to implanted biomaterials 8-10. Recently it was shown that the implant-induced foreign body response can be inhibited through selective targeting of the monocyte/macrophage-expressed colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF1R) receptor 10. Importantly, while macrophage numbers in the IP space as well as Farah et al.

The use of growth modifiers in natural, biological, and synthetic crystallization is a ubiquitous strategy for controlling growth and achieving desired physicochemical properties. For crystals that grow classically (i.e., monomer-by-monomer addition), theories of crystallization are well established and the field of growth modification is rather mature, although many questions remain regarding the molecular driving forces of modifier–crystal interactions. A new frontier in crystallization is the application of classical methods to tailor materials that grow nonclassically (i.e., growth by the addition of species more complex than monomers). A recent surge of interest and activity in this field has been driven by mounting evidence of both inorganic and organic materials that grow via nonclassical pathways. In these systems, the challenge of elucidating the mechanism(s) of crystallization is underscored by a diversity of growth units that far outnumber those available for classical routes. In this Perspective, we discuss growth modification in nonclassical crystallization, including examples in the literature, the challenges associated with elucidating the modes of modifier action, and to what degree classical theories can be applied to these complex problems as a means of establishing versatile blueprints for crystal engineering.