ObjectiveOocyte degeneration often occurs after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and the risk factor is low-quality oocytes. The follicular fluid (FF) provides a crucial microenvironment for oocyte development. We investigated the relationships between the FF volume aspirated from individual follicles and oocyte retrieval, oocyte maturity, oolemma stretchability, fertilization, and development.MethodsThis retrospective study included data obtained from 229 ICSI cycles. Ovarian stimulation was performed according to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. Each follicle was individually aspirated and divided into six groups according to FF volume (<1.0, 1.0 to <2.0, 2.0 to <3.0, 3.0 to <4.0, 4.0 to <5.0, and ≥5.0 mL). Oolemma stretchability during ICSI was evaluated using a mechanical stimulus for oolemma penetration, that is, the stretchability was assessed by oolemma penetration with aspiration (high stretchability) or without aspiration (low stretchability).ResultsOocyte retrieval rates were significantly lower in the <1.0 mL group than in the ≥1.0 mL groups (46.0% [86/187] vs. 67.5%–74.3% [172/255 to 124/167], respectively; p<0.01). Low oolemma stretchability was significantly more common in the <1.0 mL group than in the ≥1.0 mL groups during ICSI (22.0% [13/59] vs. 5.8%–9.4% [6/104 to 13/139], respectively; p=0.018). There was a relationship between FF volume and oolemma stretchability. However, there were no significant differences in the rates of fertilization, cleavage, ≥7 cells at day 3, and blastocyst development among all groups.ConclusionFF volume is potentially associated with the stretchability of metaphase II oolemma during ICSI. Regarding oolemma stretchability, ensuring a uniform follicular size during ovarian stimulation is crucial to obtain good-quality oocytes.

PurposeThe authors previously revealed the association of the follicular fluid (FF) volume with oolemma stretchability following the gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, the impact of the GnRH agonist protocol on oolemma stretchability remains unclear.MethodsData that were obtained from 74 ICSI cycles were reviewed retrospectively. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed in accordance with the short GnRH agonist protocol. Each follicle was individually aspirated and assigned to one of six groups, according to the FF volume. The oolemma stretchability during ICSI was evaluated by using a mechanical stimulus for oolemma penetration; that is, oolemma penetration with or without aspiration (high vs low stretchability, respectively).ResultsThe incidence of low oolemma stretchability was significantly higher in the <1.0 mL group than that in the ≥1.0 mL group. The normal fertilization rate was significantly lower in the <1.0 mL group than that in the 2.0‐<3.0 mL group. The rate of blastocyst development was lower in the <1.0 mL group than that in the 3.0‐<4.0 mL group.ConclusionThe FF volume potentially was associated with metaphase II oolemma stretchability, fertilization, and blastocyst development.

Aim To evaluate whether embryo selection using the early embryo viability assessment (EEVA) score increases the ongoing pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients. Methods One hundred eighty‐one patients whose serum anti mullerian hormone (AMH) level was greater than 0.5 ng/μL were enrolled in the study. All patients received oocyte retrieval repeatedly from June 2017 to January 2019. Transferred embryos were selected using the EEVA score and Veeck's criteria. We investigated the blastocyst rate according to the EEVA score and Veeck's criteria and also evaluated the clinical outcome following embryo transfer of the blastocysts. Results Blastocyst development rate (48.7%) and high‐quality blastocyst (42.4%) of Veeck 1 was statistically higher than others. The blastocyst rate (71.4%) and high‐quality blastocyst rate (60.0%) for EEVA 1 was the highest, and a correlation between the EEVA score and the blastocyst rate was also identified in cases younger than 40 years. Blastocyst rate of EEVA 1 + 2 (69.8% 208/298) was statistically higher than that of Veeck 1 + 2 (40.1% 317/791) (p < 0.05) and high‐quality blastocyst rate of EEVA 1 + 2 (50.0% 104/208) was also higher than that of Veeck 1 + 2 (36.6% 117/320) (p < 0.05). However, there was a significant correlation between EEVA and the pregnancy rate and pregnancy rate of EEVA 1 + 2 showed no statistical difference compared with Veeck 1 + 2. Conclusions Although it remains to be answered whether a computer can substitute Veeck's classification, the EEVA score could be a viable alternative to predict the blastocyst rate and to select those high‐potential embryos that improve the pregnancy rate.