Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate were obtained. A deep learning with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and a non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and bag-of-word (BoW), a representative method for image recognition and analysis, were used to distinguish pathologically confirmed PCa patients from prostate benign conditions (BCs) patients with prostatitis or prostate benign hyperplasia (BPH). In fully automated detection of PCa patients, deep learning had a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) than non-deep learning (P = 0.0007 < 0.001). The AUCs were 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.89) for deep learning method and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.77) for non-deep learning method, respectively. Our results suggest that deep learning with DCNN is superior to non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and BoW model for fully automated PCa patients differentiation from prostate BCs patients. Our deep learning method is extensible to image modalities such as MR imaging, CT and PET of other organs.

To evaluate the performance of a multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI)-based radiomics signature for discriminating between clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and insignificant PCa (ciPCa). Materials and methods: Two hundred and eighty patients with pathology-proven PCa were enrolled and were randomly divided into training and test cohorts. Eight hundred and nineteen radiomics features were extracted from mp-MRI for each patient. The minority group in the training cohort was balanced via the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) method. We used minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance (mRMR) selection and the LASSO algorithm for feature selection and radiomics signature building. The classification performance of the radiomics signature for csPCa and ciPCa was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the training and test cohorts. Results: Nine features were selected for the radiomics signature building. Significant differences in the radiomics signature existed between the csPCa and ciPCa groups in both the training and test cohorts (p < 0.01 for both). The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics signature were 0.872 (95% CI: 0.823−0.921), 0.883, and 0.753, respectively, in the training cohort, and 0.823 (95% CI: 0.669−0.976), 0.841, and 0.727, respectively, in the test cohort. Conclusion: Mp-MRI-based radiomics signature have the potential to noninvasively discriminate between csPCa and ciPCa.

No abstract