Background: For patients with end-stage kidney disease, living donor kidney transplant is the treatment of choice due to improved patient outcomes, longer graft survival, and reduced expenses compared with other forms of renal replacement therapy. However, organ shortage remains a challenge, and living donation rates have stagnated in recent years, particularly among men. Objective: To understand the motivators and barriers for past and potential living kidney transplant donors and inform policy and practice changes that support donors in the future. Methods: Past and potential living donors in British Columbia, Canada in the preceding 2 years were surveyed. Motivators and barriers were examined in 5 categories: family pressures and domestic responsibilities, finances, the recovery process, complications, and the transplant evaluation process. Participants ranked statements in each category on a Likert-type scale. Results: A total of 138 responses were collected. In both women and men, policies that address family and domestic responsibilities and finances were most strongly identified as motivators to donate. A large proportion of women and men reported that guaranteed job security (47% women and 38% of men), paid time off (51% of women and 42% of men), reimbursement of lost wages (49% of women and 38% of men), and protections to guarantee no impact on future insurability (62% of women and 52% of men) were significant motivators to donate. Timely and efficient medical evaluation was considered to be an important motivator for donation, with 52% of men and 43% of women reporting support for a “fast-track” option for evaluation to allow for a more rapid evaluation process. Median barrier and motivator scores were similar between women and men. Conclusion: Policies to decrease financial burden, ensure job security, improve childcare support, and offer a fast-track medical evaluation may motivate potential living kidney donors, irrespective of gender.

No abstract

Background:Underserved populations, such as ethnic minorities, low-income adults, and Indigenous people living with arthritis are more likely to have lower health literacy, higher rates of multi-morbidity, and face challenges in accessing care1-3. Self-management support (SMS) can help to mitigate the impacts of living with arthritis4. However, we require a more in-depth understanding of the daily barriers underserved communities face in living with arthritis in order to develop effective SMS that can meaningfully improve well-being and quality of life.Objectives:The study objective was to bring together underserved people living with arthritis to identify common barriers they face in taking care of their conditions in daily life, and to identify their solutions to the identified challenges.Methods:A team of researchers from several universities, nurse practitioners, physicians, policy makers, an arthritis consumer-patient leader and our community partners (Multi-lingual Orientation Service Association for Immigrant Communities and the Portland Hotel Society Community Services Society) engaged in a Community-based Participatory and Concept Mapping (CM) study5-7 where participants from underserved communities identified major barriers they face in managing arthritis, agreed on key themes that emerged, and determined priorities for actions. This involved three key CM activities: 1) brainstorming ideas; 2) sorting and rating ideas; and 3) analyzing and interpreting concept maps8. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews and prioritized and interpreted in workshop settings.Results:Sixty-three individuals who were ethnic minorities, immigrants, refugees, low-income, over 65, and/or housing insecure and living with arthritis identified 35 common barriers and made recommendations in the areas of financial difficulties, social services, access to health services, quality of health services, lack of knowledge, and mental health. Additional funding has been sought through Community-University Engagement Support Funding to enable our community partners to prioritize the recommendations in their communities, and to develop mechanisms for implementation using already existing community structures, processes, and services.Conclusion:Persons living with arthritis in diverse underserved communities face significant health and social inequities, including lack of access to basic life necessities such as food, housing, employment, and safety, which creates barriers to self-managing arthritis and other chronic conditions in daily life. SMS for these communities needs to address these social and environmental barriers shaping capacity for self-management, and ultimately, quality of life and well-being.References:[1]Ackerman I, Busija L. Access to self-management education, conservative treatment and surgery for arthritis according to socioeconomic status. Best Pr Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):561–83.[2]Shadmi E. Multimorbidity and equity in health. Int J Equity Heal. 2013;12(59):59.[3]Foster M, Kendall E, Dickson P, Chaboyer W, Hunter B, Gee T. Participation and chronic disease self-management: are we risking inequitable resource allocation? Aust J Prim Health. 2003;9(3):132–40.[4]Brady T, Anderson L, Kobau R. Chronic disease self-management support: public health perspectives. Front Public Heal. 2015;2(234).[5]Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Progr Plann. 1989;12(1):1–16.[6]Anderson L, Day K, Vandenberg A. Using a concept map as a tool for strategic planning: the healthy brain initiative. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(5):A117.[7]Petrucci C, Quinlan K. Bridging the research practice gap: concept mapping as a mixed methods strategy in practice-based research and evaluation. J Soc Serv Res. 2007;34(2):25–42.[8]Kane M, Trochim W. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2007.Disclosure of Interests:None declared