No abstract

No abstract

Energy generation performance of a piezoelectric generator depends mainly on several elements such as the structural style, boundary conditions, geometry parameters, materials, vibration-source frequency, and external load. To obtain the optimal energy-harvesting device, the Raleigh method is used to establish the analysis model of circular piezoelectric composite diaphragms. Simply supported and clamped boundary conditions were considered. The relationships between the output power and the structural parameters of piezoelectric composite diaphragms, and the external load resistance and frequency were shown. Given the correlative material parameters and boundary conditions, the output power, using structural parameters, external load, or vibrating frequency as variables, can be calculated. Simulation results show that there are optimal structural parameters and load for a composite diaphragm to achieve the maximum output power. A piezoelectric diaphragm generator with given dimensions tends to achieve higher output power under clamped boundary conditions than that under simply supported boundary conditions.

The energy conversion efficiency (ECE) of a piezoelectric generator can be denoted by its effective electromechanical coupling coefficient (EECC), which depends only on the geometry parameters with a certain boundary conditions. To obtain the optimal energy-harvesting device, the Raleigh Method was utilized to establish the analysis model of circular piezoelectric composite diaphragms. Simply supported and clamped boundary conditions were considered. The relationships between the performance parameters (EECC and natural frequency) and the structural parameters (diametric ratio β and thickness ratio α) of piezoelectric composite diaphragms were figured out. Given the correlative material parameters and boundary conditions, the performance parameters with the structural parameters as variables can be worked out. The simulation results show that the optimal structural parameters of a composite diaphragm in the case of the simply supported and clamped boundary conditions are different. A simply supported diaphragm generator tends to achieve higher effective electromechanical coupling coefficient and lower natural frequency, and is more suitable for the applications of energy harvesting.