Host specialization among closely related herbivores is common and is therefore a major theme in ecology. Despite its ecological importance, no general explanatory framework for host specialization is currently available. We introduce a new model of the evolution of host specialization in herbivorous insects. We use a twodimensional lattice comprising 32 9 32 cells. Moreover, the model incorporates reproductive interference, defined as any negative outcomes resulting from interspecific mating, between two species of herbivores feeding on two different host plants as well as ordinary resource competition and differences in host suitability. Our simulation showed that reproductive interference, together with other factors such as host-related performance and resource competition, can actually drive the evolution of host specialization and thereby host partitioning between herbivorous insects during secondary contact. Host specialization arises particularly when levels of both reproductive interference and resource competition are intermediate. In contrast, host specialization seldom occurs if reproductive interference is absent. Thus, reproductive interference is as key to specialization as is spatial partitioning, which was not regarded as a realistic outcome when only resource competition was considered.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology This content downloaded from 131.104.Abstract. A series of experiments indicate that induced changes occur in the foliage of the annual morning glory Ipomoea purpurea when subjected to prior damage. These changes reduce the growth rate, consumption rate, and growth efficiency of larvae of the generalist lepidopteran Spodoptera eridania. They also alter the pattern of damage caused by specialist flea beetles, Chaetocnema confines, and by generalist insect herbivores in the field. No effects of induction were detected on specialist tortoise beetles, Deloyala guttata and Metriona bicolor. Although total damage by both flea beetles and generalist insects did not differ between induced and noninduced plants, this result does not necessarily imply that the effects on these insects were nonadaptive. The observed effects of induced response are consistent with both "diffuse" and "pairwise" views of the selection imposed by herbivores on plant resistance. Finally, the existence of induced responses suggests that previous conclusions by Simms and Rausher that resistance to flea beetles and generalist insects is not costly in I. purpurea may be premature.
Intra-and interspecific larval interactions that take place in a host body were investigated for two tachinid flies Epicampocera succincta and Compsilura concinnata (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitizing Pieris butterfly larvae. E. succincta, a specialist on Pieris butterflies, showed contest-type intraspecific competition, eliminating all the other conspecific larvae. On the other hand, an extreme generalist parasitoid C. concinnata exhibited scramble-type competition, sharing the host with other conspecifics and suffering reduced body size as a result. However, when these two species occurred together in a single host, C. concinnata had a much higher chance of survival. Moreover, C. concinnata could often survive in the presence of a parasitoid wasp Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) while E. succincta could not. The high tolerance of C. concinnata could be attributable to its being an extreme generalist" To attack and survive on many different hosts, one has to be able to deal with various competitors. The competitive inferiority of the specialist E. succincta, on the other hand, may be a result of relatively recent encounter with those competitors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.