The treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus has evolved with the development of improved imaging and arthroscopic techniques. However, the outcome of treatment for large cystic type-V lesions is poor, using conventional grafting, debridement or microfracture techniques. This retrospective study examined the outcomes of 50 patients with a cystic talar defect who were treated with arthroscopically harvested, cored osteochondral graft taken from the ipsilateral knee. Of the 50 patients, 45 (90%) had a mean good to excellent score of 80.3 (52 to 90) in the Karlsson-Peterson Ankle Score, at a mean follow-up of 36 months (24 to 83). A malleolar osteotomy for exposure was needed in 26 patients and there were no malleolar mal- or nonunions. One patient had symptoms at the donor site three months after surgery; these resolved after arthroscopic release of scar tissue. This technique is demanding with or without a malleolar osteotomy, but if properly performed has a high likelihood of success.
This is a retrospective review of 49 subtalar arthroscopies performed between 1989 and 1996. Patients were evaluated in the following areas: (1) preoperative diagnosis, (2) preoperative tests and clinical evaluation, (3) intraoperative findings, (4) postoperative diagnosis,(5) complications, and (6) clinical outcome. Particular attention was paid to the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis, subtalar instability, intraoperative findings in sinus tarsi syndrome, and clinical outcome. Overall, this study demonstrated a success rate of 94% good and excellent results in the treatment of various types of subtalar pathologic conditions with arthroscopic techniques. The Workers' Compensation cases reported 90% good and excellent results. The complication rate was low, with five minor complications reported. The most common complication was a transient neuropraxia involving branches of the superficial peroneal nerve. Of the 14 feet that had a preoperative diagnosis of sinus tarsi syndrome, all the diagnoses were changed at the time of arthroscopy. The postoperative diagnoses included 10 interosseous ligament tears, two cases of arthrofibrosis, and two degenerative joints. Based on these findings, "sinus tarsi syndrome" seems to be an inaccurate term that should be replaced with a specific diagnosis. Arthroscopy is the tool that will allow the orthopaedic surgeon to make a more accurate diagnosis.
The purpose of this study was to determine the position and relative safety of the anterior, posterior, and newly defined middle portals by measuring their distance from the neurovascular structures and tendons on the lateral side of the foot and ankle. Furthermore, this study demonstrates specific components of the posterior subtalar joint and arthroscopic access to each utilizing a technique that allows direct anatomic correlation. The 15 specimens were divided into three groups of five feet each, with one arthroscopic portal site and one instrumentation portal site per group. Group I used the anterior portal for the arthroscope and the posterior portal for the curette. Group II used the posterior portal for the arthroscope and the anterior portal for the curette. In group III, the arthroscope was inserted through the anterior portal and the curette through the middle portal. The sural nerve and small saphenous vein were at risk with posterior portal placement. The anterior portal presented a minor risk of injury to the dorsal intermediate cutaneous branch of the superficial peroneal nerve. The middle portal was without risk to surrounding structures. Group I provided the best access to the posterior facet of the subtalar joint. Group II provided excellent arthroscopic visualization of the posterior facet, but poor access for instrumentation via the anterior portal. Group III provided the best access to the sinus tarsi. No combination of portals allowed visualization or instrumentation of the middle or anterior facets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.