Introduction: The epidemic of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) has many known health consequences. Robust research has linked ACEs to increased morbidity and mortality. Because of their frequent interaction with children and their families, pediatricians should be educated to recognize ACEs and practice trauma-informed care (TIC). There is a lack of education for pediatric residents on ACEs despite their significance. Our goals were to identify residents' baseline perceived importance, confidence, and frequency of discussion of ACEs, TIC, toxic stress, and resiliency and evaluate the efficacy of an educational module addressing these topics. Methods: A 25-minute self-directed module was created for pediatric residents. The module was accessible online and independently completed by residents during the child advocacy rotation. Pre-and postmodule surveys using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = low, 5 = high) were administered, and median scores of 11 participants who completed both surveys were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Presurvey results demonstrated that residents were not confident discussing ACEs, TIC, or resiliency (median = 2). Residents reported that it was very important to discuss ACEs, toxic stress, and resiliency with families (median = 5), although they were rarely discussed in clinic (median = 1 or 2). Matched pre/post data showed significant increases in knowledge, confidence, and discussion frequency. Discussion: The results demonstrated a need for ACE education for pediatric residents. The matched survey results showed the module's success in knowledge and behavior change. The module can be adapted to other learners to enhance understanding of ACEs.

Limited data exist about the ideal timing of developmental screening for young children entering foster care, and current best practice recommends screening by 1 month into care to prioritize resources for evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) compare detection rates for potential developmental delay (DD) at foster care entry before and after implementation of a developmental screen and (2) examine accuracy of developmental screening when performed at entry and 1 month into care. Charts of 124 children \6 years evaluated for an initial foster care health assessment (IFCHA) were reviewed to determine baseline detection rates for potential DD. The Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) screening tool was then prospectively administered to 167 children \6 years during their IFCHA to determine detection rates. One month following the IFCHA, caregivers were recontacted, and the screen was re-administered. Accuracy of the initial PEDS screen was compared to the 1 month PEDS screen by calculation of sensitivity and specificity. At baseline, potential DD was detected in 34 % of children at the IFCHA compared to 46 % after implementation of the PEDS (P = 0.041). Compared to the 1 month screen, the early screen had a sensitivity of 75 % and specificity of 88 %. Use of a developmental screening tool at foster care entry increased detection of potential DD, and the results remained consistent with screening 1 month later. These results support use of a developmental screen for children in foster care and suggest that screening be performed as early as possible to expedite necessary evaluations and referrals.

No abstract

No abstract