SUMMARY Eating and sleeping represent two mutually exclusive behaviors that satisfy distinct homeostatic needs. Because an animal cannot eat and sleep at the same time, brain systems that regulate energy homeostasis are likely to influence sleep/wake behavior. Indeed, previous studies indicate that animals adjust sleep cycles around periods of food need and availability. Furthermore, hormones that affect energy homeostasis also affect sleep/wake states: the orexigenic hormone ghrelin promotes wakefulness, while the anorexigenic hormones leptin and insulin increase the duration of slow wave sleep. However, whether neural populations that regulate feeding can influence sleep/wake states is unknown. The hypothalamic arcuate nucleus contains two neuronal populations that exert opposing effects on energy homeostasis: agouti-related protein (AgRP)-expressing neurons detect caloric need and orchestrate food-seeking behavior, while activity in pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC)-expressing neurons induces satiety. We tested the hypotheses that AgRP neurons affect sleep homeostasis by promoting states of wakefulness, while POMC neurons promote states of sleep. Indeed, optogenetic or chemogenetic stimulation of AgRP neurons in mice promoted wakefulness while decreasing the quantity and integrity of sleep. Inhibition of AgRP neurons rescued sleep integrity in food-deprived mice, highlighting the physiological importance of AgRP neuron activity for the suppression of sleep by hunger. Conversely, stimulation of POMC neurons promoted sleep states and decreased sleep fragmentation in food-deprived mice. Interestingly, we also found that sleep deprivation attenuated the effects of AgRP neuron activity on food intake and wakefulness. These results indicate that homeostatic feeding neurons can hierarchically affect behavioral outcomes depending on homeostatic need.

No abstract

Introduction: Our goal was to standardize intraoperative analgesic regimens for pediatric ambulatory tonsillectomy by eliminating local anesthetic use and to determine its impact on postoperative pain measures, while controlling for other factors. Methods: We assembled a quality improvement team at an ambulatory surgery center. They introduced a standardized anesthetic protocol, involving American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification 1 and 2 patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Local anesthesia elimination was the project’s single intervention. We collected pre-intervention data (79 cases) from July 5 to September 17, 2019 and post-intervention data (59 cases) from September 25 to December 17, 2019. The intervention requested that surgeons eliminate the use of local anesthetics. The following outcomes measures were evaluated using statistical process control charts and Shewhart’s theory of variation: (1) maximum pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit, (2) total post-anesthesia care unit minutes, and (3) postoperative opioid rescue rate. Results: No special cause variation signal was detected in any of the measures following the intervention. Conclusions: Our data suggest that eliminating intraoperative local anesthetic use does not worsen postoperative pain control at our facility. The intervention eliminated the added expenses and possible risks associated with local anesthetic use. This series is unique in its standardization of anesthetic regimen in a high-volume ambulatory surgery center with the exception of local anesthesia practices. The study results may impact the standardized clinical protocol for pediatric ambulatory adenotonsillectomy at our institution and may hold relevance for other centers.