R ecently, the indication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been expanded not only to patients with degenerative aortic stenosis considered inoperable or of high surgical risk but also to those with intermediate surgical risk. [1][2][3] Thus, optimal patient risk stratification should be performed before the TAVR procedure. Frailty, which is not captured in the classical surgical risk model, is considered highly prevalent in elderly vulnerable patients and can be characterized by Background-Gait speed reflects an important factor of frailty and is associated with an increased risk of late mortality in patients with cardiac disease. This study sought to assess the prognostic value of gait speed in elderly patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results-We investigated the 5-m or 15-feet gait speed (m/sec) in 1256 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using data from the OCEAN-TAVI Japanese multicenter registry (Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation). Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and all-cause mortality were compared among groups defined by differential gait speed classification: model 1, normal (>0.83 m/sec; n=563; 44.8%), slow (0.5-0.83 m/sec; n=429; 34.2%), slowest (<0.83 m/sec; n=205; 16.3%), unable to walk (n=48; 3.8%); and model 2, classification and regression tree survival model indicating the threshold of gait speed as 0.385 m/sec (>0.385 m/sec; n=1080 versus ≤0.385 m/sec; n=117). The cumulative 1-year mortality rate showed significant differences in the classical gait speed groups in model 1 (7.6%, 6.6%, 18.2%, and 40.7%, respectively; P<0.001) and survival classification and regression tree group in model 2 (7.7% versus 21.9%; P<0.001). The slowest walkers and those unable to walk demonstrated independent associations with increased midterm mortality after adjustment for several confounding factors (hazard ratio, 1.83, 4.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.26, 2.22-8.72; P=0.039, <0.001, respectively). Gait speed <0.385 m/sec determined by classification and regression tree also independently associated with worse prognosis (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-5.88; P=0.001). Conclusions-Gait speed using both traditional and specific classification is useful as a potential marker for predicting vulnerable patients associated with adverse clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. (Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005088.
The relative benefit of replacing saturated fatty acid with linoleic acids is still being debated because a linoleic acid-enriched diet increases oxidative and inflammatory stresses, although it is associated with a reduction in serum cholesterol levels. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation of linoleic acid-rich (HL) fat, compared with a saturated fatty acid-rich (SF) fat on atherosclerotic lesion areas, serum and liver cholesterol levels, oxidative stress (urinary isoprostanes and serum malondialdehayde) and inflammatory stress (expression of aortic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MCP-1) in apo E-deficient mice. Male and female apo E-deficient mice (8 weeks old; seven to eight per group) were fed an AIN-76-based diet containing SF fat (50 g palm oil and 50 g lard/kg) or HL fat (100 g high-linoleic safflower-seed oil/kg) for 9 weeks. Compared with the SF diet, the HL diet lowered atherosclerosis (P,0·05). It reduced serum total cholesterol levels (P,0·05), increased HDL-cholesterol levels (P,0·05) and lowered liver esterified cholesterol levels (P,0·01). The HL diet-fed mice showed increased expression of MCP-1 mRNA (P,0·05), serum levels of malondialdehayde (P,0·05) and urinary excretion of 2,3-dinor-5,6-dihydro-8-iso-prostaglandin F2a; P,0·05). These results suggest that having biomarkers in vivo for oxidative stress and inflammatory status of endothelial cells does not necessarily indicate predisposition to an increased lesion area in the aortic root in apo E-deficient mice fed an HL or SF diet.
Hormone therapy has been used for patients with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)–positive breast cancers. Recently, some studies reported the expression of ERα on neoplastic cells from B‐cell lymphomas. However, there has been only one report of ERα expression on the follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) that structurally and functionally support the microenvironment of follicular lymphomas (FLs). The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of ERα expression on FDCs in nonneoplastic reactive lymphoid tissues and to compare the frequency of ERα expression on FDCs in the axillary lymph nodes between patients with and without antiestrogen therapy and among patients with grades 1‐3 of FL. Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect ERα mRNA in FL. In nonneoplastic germinal centers (GCs) from patients with tonsillitis or reactive lymphadenitis, ERα was expressed in the light zone. ERα‐positive cells strongly correlated with the width of GCs (
r
s
= 0.81,
P
< 0.01) and the CD21‐positive (
r
s
= 0.69,
P
< 0.01) and CD23‐positive (
r
s
= 0.83,
P
< 0.01) FDC meshwork. The axillary lymph nodes had fewer ERα‐positive cells, smaller GCs, and a looser CD21‐ and CD23‐positive FDC meshwork with hormone therapy than without hormone therapy (
P
< 0.01). Neoplastic follicles of G1‐2 FL had more ERα‐positive cells and a larger CD23
+
FDC meshwork than those of G3 FL (
P
< 0.01). ERα mRNA was detected in both G1‐2 FL and G3 FL by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. In conclusion, these results suggested that antiestrogen hormone therapy may decrease the number of ERα‐positive FDCs and that the responses mediated by the estrogen‐ERα interaction on FDCs may differ between G1‐2 FL and G3 FL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.