No abstract

No abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

No abstract

This article examines the research methods used by Peters and Waterman in their book, In Search of Excellence (1982), and describes the results of empirical tests done to assess whether their exemplary firms are actually excellent. Peters and Waterman's "excellent" firms were compared with 1,000firms evaluated by Forbes in its annual report on American industry. Four measures offinancial performance were used: return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), market valuation, and sales growth. A series of difference-of-means tests and direct tests were used to analyze the data. Results indicate that the excellent firms are not as superior as Peters and Waterman have suggested. The implications of these findings for culturelperformance research are discussed.