Optimization and standardization of radiographic procedures in a health region minimizes patient exposure while producing diagnostic images. This report highlights the dose variation in common computed radiography (CR) examinations throughout a large health region. The RadChex cassette was used to measure the radiation exposure at the table or wall bucky in 20 CR rooms, in seven hospitals, using CR technology from two vendors. Exposures were made to simulate patient exposure (21 cm polymethyl methacrylate) under standard conditions for each bucky: 81 kVp at 100 cm for anteroposterior abdomen table bucky exposures (180 cm for posteroanterior chest wall bucky exposures), using the left, the right, or the center automatic exposure control (AEC) cells. Protocol settings were recorded. An average of 37% variation was found between AEC chambers, with a range between 4% and 137%. A 60% difference in dose was discovered between manufacturers, which was the result of the manufacture's image processing algorithm and subsequently corrected via software updates. Finally, standardizing AEC cell selection during common chest examinations could reduce patient dose by up to 30%. In a large health region, variation in exam protocols can occur, leading to unnecessary patient dose from the same type of examination. Quality control programs must monitor exam protocols and AEC chamber calibration in CR to ensure consistent, minimal, patient dose, regardless of hospital or CR vendor. Furthermore, this report highlights the need for communication between radiologists, technologists, medical physicist, service engineers, and manufacturers required to optimize CR protocols.

Initiated by complaints of image artifacts, a thorough visual and radiographic investigation of 197 Fuji, 35 Agfa, and 37 Kodak computed radiography (CR) cassettes with imaging plates (IPs) in clinical use at four radiology departments was performed. The investigation revealed that the physical deterioration of the cassettes and IPs was more extensive than previously believed. It appeared that many of the image artifacts were the direct result of premature wear of the cassettes and imaging plates. The results indicate that a quality control program for CR cassettes and IPs is essential and should include not only cleaning of the cassettes and imaging plates on a regular basis, but also visual and radiographic image inspection to limit the occurrence of image artifacts and to prolong the life cycle of the CR equipment.

Lead protective garments worn by medical staff in the presence of x-rays develop defects over time. This work proposes a novel method of assessing the protective efficacy of the garments as defects develop. The proposed method applies updated radiobiology data from ICRP 103. 

This work applied the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle to devise a formula through which a maximum allowed defect area in lead protective garments can be calculated. This formula depends on the cross-sectional areas (A) and ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors (wt) of the most radiosensitive and overlapping organs protected by the garment, the maximum allowed additional effective dose to the garment wearer due to the defects (d), and the unattenuated absorbed dose at the surface of the garment (D). The maximum allowed defect areas are separated into three regions: above the waist, below the waist, and thyroid. To be conservative, it was assumed that D = 50 mGy yr-1, and d = 0.3 mSv yr-1. Also conservatively, transmission was assumed to be 0%, as employing a non-zero transmission factor would increase the maximum allowed defect area. 

Maximum allowed defect areas were as follows: 370 mm2 for above the waist, 37 mm2 for below the waist, and 279 mm2 for the thyroid. These can be compared to commonly published values which are 670 mm2 for an apron, 15 mm2 over the gonads, and 11-20 mm2 for the thyroid.

The proposed method for lead protective garment assessment is highly adaptable as values can be adjusted as radiobiology data are updated, and as values such as radiation dose limits vary across jurisdictions. Future works will include collection of data for unattenuated dose to apron (D) as it varies across professions, so that garments may be allowed different defect areas if relegated to individuals of specific professions.