Background The 2017 KDIGO guidelines establish a 2B grade recommendation in favor of testing Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA to assess osteoporotic fracture (OPF) risk in patients with CKD G3a-G5D. Still, controversy remains because large studies evaluating it for this particular population are lacking. Aim To establish the clinical performance of BMD measured by DXA in the evaluation of fracture risk in women with CKD. Methods We conducted a 43 year retrospective cohort study with 218 women ≥18 years-old with CKD and BMD measurement by DXA of total hip and lumbar spine. Clinical (age, year of CKD onset, comorbidities, BMI, transplant status, treatment), and biochemical (PTH, corrected calcium, phosphate, vitamin D [25 (OH) D3], creatinine, and albumin), parameters were collected from hospital records. All osteoporotic fractures (as defined by the WHO) found in the clinical and radiologic files were registered. Results 218 women with a median age of 60 years (40–73 IQ range) and a CKD evolution time of 12 years (7–18 IQ range) were evaluated. Forty-eight (28.23%) presented an OPF. These women were older (57 vs 69 years, p =0.0072) and had a lower BMD. CKD stage did not influence fracture incidence. In the multivariate analysis we found that for each standard deviation decrease in hip and lumbar spine T-Score, the overall fracture risk was 2.7 and 2.04 times higher, respectively. More than 50% of fractures took place within the first ten years of follow-up, especially with GFR <30 mL/min/m 2 and osteoporosis. Diabetes and hypothyroidism accelerated fracture onset, while renal transplant delayed it. In the ROC analysis, the AUC was largest with the total hip (0.7098, p = 0.000 ) and lumbar spine (0.6916, p = 0 .000 ). Conclusions BMD measured by DXA is a useful fracture prediction tool for women with CKD, having a sensibility and specificity similar to that in the general population. It seems to be appropriate for the diagnosis, treatment decisions, and follow-up of patients with renal failure.

Background The Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán is a teaching hospital which was converted into a Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) designated hospital on mid-March 2020. In Mexico City, the COVID-19 peak started in mid-April 2020. A considerable proportion of those diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were treated by ambulatory care. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics at diagnosis of ambulatory patients diagnosed with COVID-19, their willingness to donate plasma and their clinical outcomes at one month of the follow-up call program implementation. Methods A call strategy follow-up program (FUP) was established on April 19, 2020. All ambulatory patients received at least 3 calls every 48–72 hours, followed by 2 weekly calls. A team of voluntary medical students, general practitioners, fellows, and medical specialists was assembled for this purpose. Signs of alarm (fever &gt;72 hours, shortness of breath, respiratory insufficiency) and other clinical signs were collected on every call. Willingness to donate plasma and possibility of a correct home isolation were also addressed. Results From April 19 to May 18, 2020, a total of 360 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV2, of whom 350 were followed. Their median age was 44 years (33–51), and 55% were female. 145 (41%) had completed all FUP calls and 194 (55%) referred to be asymptomatic in their last call. We identified 8 patients with signs of alarm during the calls, and 2 of them required hospitalization. During the FUP, 66% referred fatigue that limited their activities, 56% anosmia or dysgeusia, 32% headache, and 22% diarrhea. 90% were capable to properly isolate in their homes. Willingness to donate plasma was assessed in 89 patients, of whom, 75 (84%) manifested their willingness to donate. Conclusion Ambulatory follow-up is feasible and effective to identify those in need of hospitalization. Remarkably, half of the ambulatory patients had no comorbidities and presented anosmia/dysgeusia as the most frequent symptoms during follow-up. Willingness to donate plasma was high in this cohort. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures