Frailty, a geriatric syndrome of growing importance in recent years, has been shown to be associated with increased risk of disability and adverse health and socioeconomic outcomes. Therefore, there is a need for new educational strategies for physical medicine and rehabilitation residents to promote greater geriatric competencies, with a focus on developing customized evaluation and management plans. With this article, the aim is offering a quick reference tool summarizing the latest evidence on the rehabilitative management of frailty. Indeed, a comprehensive geriatric evaluation is needed before developing an evidence-based and individually tailored rehabilitation program including physical activity, educative strategies, nutritional interventions, and proposals for social reintegration. In the future, appropriate educational training may allow a more careful management of these patients, with consequent improvements in quality of life and functionality.

No abstract

Modern rehabilitation is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). We will discuss this Classification process in frailty. Frailty is defined as a condition of reduced functional reserve, a state of vulnerability that involves poor recovery of homeostasis and increased susceptibility to stressor mechanisms, with consequent difficulty in returning to the previous condition of balance. Rehabilitation of frailty is reported in the ICF, although, its consensus is not sufficiently addressed due to its recent identification and the limited available information regarding how it should be formulated. Thus, the aim of the present article is to present the current evidence-based rehabilitation strategies applied in management of frailty.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent joint disease and one of the leading causes of disability, poor physical activity levels (PAL), and quality of life (Qol) of elderly people worldwide. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the superiority of a novel group-based physical therapy (GBPT) intervention compared to a more traditional one-to-one individual physical therapy (IPT) among elderly Bulgarian subjects underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred and thirty elderly TKA recipients of both genders with mean age=72.69±0.44 were randomly assigned to GBPT or to one-to-one IPT. Elderly participants were assessed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after both rehabilitation interventions, with the use of the following evaluation tools: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36v2). At 6 months elderly TKA recipients who received GBPT achieved 7.36 points more in the PASE questionnaire when compared with the IPT group. Elderly participants of the GBPT group walked significantly longer distance during the 6MWT than TKA recipients attended IPT, respectively 421.56 m vs. 398.62 m, (p< 0.001). Furthermore, significantly greater improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was obtained from the elderly participants of the GBPT arm compared with the participants of the IPT arm, respectively 70, 7% vs. 60, 8% at 6 months follow up. We conclude that our results suggest the superiority of the GBPT in terms of PAL (PASE score, 6MWT) and HRQoL among elderly TKA recipients across the first 6 months.