After 12 mo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation (2 groups received CLA as part of a triglyceride or as the free fatty acid, and 1 group received olive oil as placebo), 134 of the 157 participants who concluded the study were included in an open study for another 12 mo. The goals of the extension study were to evaluate the safety [with clinical chemistry analyses and reported adverse events (AEs)] and assess the effects of CLA on body composition [body fat mass (BFM), lean body mass (LBM), bone mineral mass (BMM)], body weight, and BMI. All subjects were supplemented with 3.4g CLA/d in the triglyceride form. Circulating lipoprotein(a) and thrombocytes increased in all groups. There was no change in fasting blood glucose. Aspartate amino transferase, but not alanine amino transferase, increased significantly. Plasma total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced, whereas HDL cholesterol and triglycerides were unchanged. The AE rate decreased compared with the first 12 mo of the study. Body weight and BFM were reduced in the subjects administered the placebo during the initial 12 mo study (-1.6 +/- 3.2 and -1.7 +/- 2.8 kg, respectively). No fat or body weight changes occurred in the 2 groups given CLA during the initial 12 mo. LBM and BMM were not affected in any of the groups. Changes in body composition were not related to diet and/or training. In conclusion, this study shows that CLA supplementation for 24 mo in healthy, overweight adults was well tolerated. It confirms also that CLA decreases BFM in overweight humans, and may help maintain initial reductions in BFM and weight in the long term.
Long-term supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduces body fat mass (BFM) and increases or maintains lean body mass (LBM). However, the regional effect of CLA was not studied. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of CLA per region and safety in healthy, overweight and obese adults. A total of 118 subjects (BMI: 28-32 kg/m 2 ) were included in a double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were randomised into two groups supplemented with either 3·4 g/d CLA or placebo for 6 months. CLA significantly decreased BFM at month 3 (D ¼ 20·9 %, P¼ 0·016) and at month 6 (D ¼ 2 3·4 %, P¼ 0·043) compared with placebo. The reduction in fat mass was located mostly in the legs (D ¼ 2 0·8 kg, P, 0·001), and in women (D ¼ 21·3 kg, P¼ 0·046) with BMI . 30 kg/m 2 (D ¼ 21·9 kg, P¼ 0·011), compared with placebo. The waist -hip ratio decreased significantly (P¼ 0·043) compared with placebo. LBM increased (D ¼ þ0·5 kg, P¼ 0·049) within the CLA group. Bone mineral content was not affected (P¼ 0·70). All changes were independent of diet and physical exercise. Safety parameters including blood lipids, inflammatory and diabetogenic markers remained within the normal range. Adverse events did not differ between the groups. It is concluded that supplementation with CLA in healthy, overweight and obese adults decreases BFM in specific regions and is well tolerated.
Objective To report an integrated analysis of two previous studies fully characterizing the clinical utility of the controlled-release gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and methods Two pivotal randomized, doubleblind studies of doxazosin GITS for BPH were assessed by an integrated analysis. Both studies included a 2-week washout period, a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in phase, and a 13-week double-blind treatment phase.One study compared doxazosin GITS, doxazosin standard (-S) and placebo in 795 men; the other compared doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S in 680 men. Doxazosin GITS was initiated at 4 mg once daily and titrated to 8 mg once daily after 7 weeks, and doxazosin-S was initiated at 1 mg once daily and titrated to a maximum of 8 mg once daily over 7 weeks as needed to achieve optimal symptom control. The primary outcome measures were mean changes from baseline to the ®nal visit for the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary¯ow rate (Q max ) in the per-protocol population. Numerous symptom-and urinary-related secondary outcomes were assessed, as were effects of therapy on male erectile dysfunction measured using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in one study. Results Both doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S signi®-cantly improved the symptoms of BPH, as shown by a 45% reduction for each in total IPSS from baseline to ®nal visit, compared with a 34% reduction in patients on placebo. Doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S produced comparable improvements in Q max that were signi®-cantly greater than with placebo, with a greater improvement sooner after treatment with doxazosin GITS than with doxazosin-S. Nearly half of the patients on doxazosin GITS had symptom relief at the 4-mg starting dose. A similar number of patients in both doxazosin groups were titrated to the maximum dose. Secondary outcomes were consistent with the primary effects. Both doxazosin GITS and doxazosin-S produced signi®cant improvements in sexual function according to IIEF scores among those with dysfunction at baseline. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar among patients treated with doxazosin GITS and placebo, and slightly lower than those on doxazosin-S. There was no apparent difference in the type of adverse events reported for the two formulations of doxazosin, although most adverse events were reported at a lower frequency with doxazosin GITS. Conclusion Doxazosin GITS is signi®cantly more effective than placebo in reducing the clinical symptoms of BPH and improving Q max , and as effective as doxazosin-S. Both doxazosin formulations improved sexual function in patients with BPH and sexual dysfunction at baseline. Doxazosin GITS produced a therapeutic effect equivalent to that of doxazosin-S, but with fewer titration steps and a slightly lower overall incidence of adverse events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.