Traditional tibial correction resulted in great variation in the locations of the postoperative mechanical ankle joint axis point. In ankles with the preoperative point more medial than the tibial plafond, the point was insufficiently moved to the lateral side, and the clinical outcomes were less satisfactory.

The extent and patterns of Lisfranc joint complex disruption in subtle Lisfranc injuries have not been well clarified. We reviewed the direct intraoperative findings for 87 patients, examined computed tomography images that had been obtained preoperatively for 73 of the patients, and classified the injuries according to the Kaar  et al. criteria as the transverse type (instability between the first cuneiform [C1] and the second metatarsal [M2] and between the second cuneiform [C2] and M2) or longitudinal type (instability between C1 and M2 and between C1 and C2). Our patients’ injuries were classified as follows: longitudinal type (38%), transverse type (30%), transverse type and first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint injury (20%), longitudinal type plus transverse type (7%), longitudinal type and first TMT joint injury (3%), and longitudinal type, transverse type, and first TMT joint injury (2%). In 11 patients, the longitudinal injury extended into the naviculo-first cuneiform joint. In 41 (56%) of the 73 patients for whom CT images were obtained, 1 or more fractures (not counting small avulsion fragments between C1 and M2) were found. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the various injury patterns possible in cases of subtle Lisfranc injury.

Purpose Osteochondral talar lesions, regardless of their size and/or chronicity, are, at our hospital, now treated by fixation of the fragment if the talar dome cartilage is judged to be healthy. The retrospective study described herein was conducted to assess clinical outcomes of this treatment strategy. Methods The study group comprised 44 patients (18 men and 26 women) with 45 such talar lesions. In all cases, the osteochondral fragment was reduced and fixed with bone harvested from the osteotomy site and shaped into peg(s) (one to four pegs per lesion). Median follow‐up was 2.1 years (1–9 years). The lesion area was measured on computed tomography arthrographs, and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle/hindfoot scale was used to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Clinical failure was defined as a JSSF score < 80 points. Results The mean JSSF score improved significantly from 63.5 points preoperatively to 93.0 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Treatment failure occurred in only one ankle (0.02%). The mean lesion area was 51.2 mm2 (range 5–147 mm2). Correlation between lesion areas and the postoperative JSSF scores was weak (r = − 0.133). Correlation between the time of the trauma to the time of fixation surgery and the postoperative JSSF scores was also weak (r = 0.042). Radiographic outcomes were good for 28 ankles, fair for 10, and poor for 7. Conclusion Fixation of the lesion fragment, regardless of size and/or chronicity, appears to be appropriate in cases of an osteochondral talar lesion. Level of evidence IV.

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2018;48:398-403.

No abstract