The extent and patterns of Lisfranc joint complex disruption in subtle Lisfranc injuries have not been well clarified. We reviewed the direct intraoperative findings for 87 patients, examined computed tomography images that had been obtained preoperatively for 73 of the patients, and classified the injuries according to the Kaar  et al. criteria as the transverse type (instability between the first cuneiform [C1] and the second metatarsal [M2] and between the second cuneiform [C2] and M2) or longitudinal type (instability between C1 and M2 and between C1 and C2). Our patients’ injuries were classified as follows: longitudinal type (38%), transverse type (30%), transverse type and first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint injury (20%), longitudinal type plus transverse type (7%), longitudinal type and first TMT joint injury (3%), and longitudinal type, transverse type, and first TMT joint injury (2%). In 11 patients, the longitudinal injury extended into the naviculo-first cuneiform joint. In 41 (56%) of the 73 patients for whom CT images were obtained, 1 or more fractures (not counting small avulsion fragments between C1 and M2) were found. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the various injury patterns possible in cases of subtle Lisfranc injury.

Purpose Osteochondral talar lesions, regardless of their size and/or chronicity, are, at our hospital, now treated by fixation of the fragment if the talar dome cartilage is judged to be healthy. The retrospective study described herein was conducted to assess clinical outcomes of this treatment strategy. Methods The study group comprised 44 patients (18 men and 26 women) with 45 such talar lesions. In all cases, the osteochondral fragment was reduced and fixed with bone harvested from the osteotomy site and shaped into peg(s) (one to four pegs per lesion). Median follow‐up was 2.1 years (1–9 years). The lesion area was measured on computed tomography arthrographs, and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle/hindfoot scale was used to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Clinical failure was defined as a JSSF score < 80 points. Results The mean JSSF score improved significantly from 63.5 points preoperatively to 93.0 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Treatment failure occurred in only one ankle (0.02%). The mean lesion area was 51.2 mm2 (range 5–147 mm2). Correlation between lesion areas and the postoperative JSSF scores was weak (r = − 0.133). Correlation between the time of the trauma to the time of fixation surgery and the postoperative JSSF scores was also weak (r = 0.042). Radiographic outcomes were good for 28 ankles, fair for 10, and poor for 7. Conclusion Fixation of the lesion fragment, regardless of size and/or chronicity, appears to be appropriate in cases of an osteochondral talar lesion. Level of evidence IV.

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2018;48:398-403.

No abstract

Background: Reconstruction of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) with ankle instability (PCFD class E) remains a substantial challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. We report the outcomes of PCFD class E treated by means of a relatively standard PCFD foot reconstruction approach with the addition of a supramalleolar lateral opening-wedge osteotomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 13 patients (15 ankles) who underwent this procedure for PCFD class E between 2010 and 2021. Mean follow-up time was 3.8 (range, 2-6.3) years. Clinical assessment was based on the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle/hindfoot scale as well as a Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Radiographic assessments, including identification of the mechanical ankle joint axis point and a modified valgus Takakura-Tanaka osteoarthritis grade, were recorded. Results: The mean JSSF score improved significantly from 45.2 preoperatively to 83.9 postoperatively ( P < .001). SAFE-Q scores at the final follow-up were 70.1 for the pain and pain-related subscale, 75.4 for the physical functioning and daily living subscale, 83.0 for the social functioning subscale, 74.4 for the shoe-related subscale, and 78.1 for the general health and well-being subscale. Radiographic measurements showed improvement in the tibiotalar tilt angle (average improvement: 5.4 degrees); orientation of the talus joint line relative to the ground (average improvement: 14.0 degrees); anteroposterior talus–first metatarsal angle (average improvement: 11.2 degrees), talonavicular coverage angle (average improvement: 21.6 degrees), and lateral talus–first metatarsal angle (average improvement: 17.0 degrees). Postoperatively, the mechanical ankle joint axis point moved medially for all patients and into the medial half of the ankle joint for 7 patients. The modified osteoarthritis stage improved postoperatively in most cases. Conclusion: In this select and relatively small group of patients who had a supramalleolar lateral opening-wedge osteotomy combined with PCFD reconstruction, we measured general improvement in JSSF scores and radiographic variables. Long-term durability of the procedure remains unknown. This procedure may be an option for preserving the ankle joint in treatment of PCFD class E with osteoarthritis of the ankle. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic.