ObjectivesInvestigation of DNA damage induced by CT x-rays in paediatric patients versus patient dose in a multicentre setting.MethodsFrom 51 paediatric patients (median age, 3.8 years) who underwent an abdomen or chest CT examination in one of the five participating radiology departments, blood samples were taken before and shortly after the examination. DNA damage was estimated by scoring γ-H2AX foci in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Patient-specific organ and tissue doses were calculated with a validated Monte Carlo program. Individual lifetime attributable risks (LAR) for cancer incidence and mortality were estimated according to the BEIR VII risk models.ResultsDespite the low CT doses, a median increase of 0.13 γ-H2AX foci/cell was observed. Plotting the induced γ-H2AX foci versus blood dose indicated a low-dose hypersensitivity, supported also by an in vitro dose–response study. Differences in dose levels between radiology centres were reflected in differences in DNA damage. LAR of cancer mortality for the paediatric chest CT and abdomen CT cohort was 0.08 and 0.13 ‰ respectively.ConclusionCT x-rays induce DNA damage in paediatric patients even at low doses and the level of DNA damage is reduced by application of more effective CT dose reduction techniques and paediatric protocols.Key Points• CT induces a small, significant number of double-strand DNA breaks in children.• More effective CT dose reduction results in less DNA damage.• Risk estimates based on the LNT hypothesis may represent underestimates.

A CT scan can help in confirming the diagnosis of an IH, especially if a mesenteric swirl is present. However, since the presented sensitivities are variable and do not reach 100%, IH might be missed, implicating that a high index of suspicion with a low threshold for explorative laparoscopy/-tomy remains the cornerstone of appropriate treatment.

Use of digital tomosynthesis of the abdomen results in improved detection of urinary stones in general over digital radiography with only a slight increase in effective dose. Use of tomosynthesis, however, was not associated with major improvement in the diagnosis of ureteral stones. The technique has potential as an alternative imaging technique in the detection and follow-up of urinary stones.

No abstract

No abstract