Thirty percent of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at least 70 years of age. This number continues to rise as life expectancy continues to increase. Still, older adults with HNSCC remain underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in ambiguity on optimal management. Older adults are a complex patient population, often requiring increased support due to issues relating to functional and performance status, medical comorbidities, and medication management. Furthermore, in older adults with HNSCC, many of these conditions are independently associated with increased toxicity and worse outcomes. Toxicity in the older adult remains difficult to predict and to understand, and as treatment decisions are based on treatment tolerability, it is essential to understand the toxicities and how to minimize them. Novel predictive scores are being developed specifically for older adults with HNSCC to understand toxicity and to assist in personalized treatment decisions. There are clinical trials presently underway that are investigating shortened radiation courses and novel, less toxic systemic treatments in this population. In the forthcoming sections, we provide a detailed overview of the clinical data, treatment paradigms, and considerations in this population. This review provides a comprehensive overview of existing clinical data and clinical considerations in the older adult head and neck cancer population. Additionally, we provide a detailed overview of pertinent current and ongoing clinical trials, as well as future areas for investigation.

No abstract

Background. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases (BM) is associated with neurocognitive decline. Given its crucial role in learning and memory, efforts to mitigate this toxicity have mostly focused on sparing radiation to the hippocampus. We hypothesized that BM are not evenly distributed across the brain and that several additional areas may be avoided in WBRT based on a low risk of developing BM. Methods. We contoured 2757 lesions in a large, single-institution database of patients with newly diagnosed BM. BM centroids were mapped onto a standard brain atlas of 55 anatomic subunits and the observed percentage of BM was compared with what would be expected based on that region's volume. A region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed in a validation cohort of patients from 2 independent institutions using equivalence and onesample hypothesis tests. Results. The brainstem and bilateral thalami, hippocampi, parahippocampal gyri, amygdala, and temporal poles had a cumulative risk of harboring a BM centroid of 4.83% in the initial cohort. This ROI was tested in 157 patients from the validation cohort and was found to have a 4.1% risk of developing BM, which was statistically equivalent between the 2 groups (P < 1 × 10-6 , upper bound). Conclusion. Several critical brain structures are at a low risk of developing BM. A risk-adapted approach to WBRT is worthy of further investigation and may mitigate the toxicities of conventional radiation.

patients (PPV: 0.44). PPV was 0.89 and 0.80 for dose at F10 and F15 respectively using a DNTCP cutoff for the allocation of ART of 5%. Using other DNTCP cutoffs did not significantly improve PPV. With this cutoff the negative predictive value was 0.90, 0.94 and 0.93 for clinical judgement, F10 and F15. Conclusion: Clinical judgement poorly identifies patients who have a >5% DNTCP between planned and delivered dose. To identify them more accurately, NTCP models based on the dose differences between planned and delivered dose at day ten could be used; thus allocating ART to patients who are most likely to benefit.

Since 2014, American states have had the option to expand their Medicaid programs as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law by former President Barack H. Obama in 2010. Emerging research has found that Medicaid expansion has had a significant impact on patients with cancer, who often face significant financial barriers to receiving the care they need. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive examination of the research conducted thus far on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer. We begin with a discussion of the history of Medicaid expansion and the key features of the ACA that facilitated it. We then review the literature, analyzing studies that have investigated the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer patients in terms of access to care, quality of care, and health outcomes. Our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion has had a positive impact on patients with cancer in a number of ways. Patients in expansion states are more likely to receive timely cancer screening and diagnoses, and are more likely to receive appropriate cancer-directed treatment. Additionally, Medicaid expansion has been associated with improvements in cancer-related health outcomes, including improved survival rates. However, limitations and gaps in the current research on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer exist, including a lack of long-term data on health outcomes. Additionally, further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms through which Medicaid expansion impacts cancer care.