Background
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) requires new treatments and targeted approaches to improve survival. The peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and retinoic X receptor alpha (RXRα) nuclear receptor pathways may be targetable with repurposed Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved agents for prevention and treatment.
Methods
Oral cancer and leukoplakia cell lines were treated with the PPARγ agonist (pioglitazone) and RXRα activator (bexarotene). PPARγ activation, cellular proliferation, apoptosis activity and phenotype, including the pharmacodynamic marker, involucrin (IVL), were subsequently analyzed using a reporter gene assay, genomic data, MTT assay and western blot.
Results
Microarray analysis of HNSCC tumor versus normal tissue shows IVL expression is significantly increased in normal tissue compared to HNSCC tumors (p < 0.0001). In MSK Leuk1 and CA 9‐22 cell lines, pioglitazone increases PPARγ DNA binding activity and IVL promoter activity in a dose dependent manner (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001). Combination treatment with pioglitazone and bexarotene increases PPARγ DNA binding activity and IVL promoter activity (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001). MTT analysis shows decreases in cell proliferation when cells are treated with pioglitazone and bexarotene. Decreases in cell proliferation are significant to at least p < 0.05 for all combination versus single agent treatments. Western blot on whole‐cell lysate from cells treated with pioglitazone and bexarotene alone or in combination for IVL showed increased protein levels with combination treatment.
Conclusions
Targeting the PPARγ/RXRα heterodimer with pioglitazone and bexarotene was effective in this preclinical project. This was functional in both preneoplastic and oral cancer cell lines. A better understanding of the molecular mechanism on downstream effects on cellular proliferation could potentially have implications clinically, both in oral preneoplasia and possibly head and neck cancer; however, more research needs to be done to explore the potential these medications have in chemoprevention.
Abstract:Amphibian populations have been declining worldwide, with multiple potential causes. At La Selva field station in north-eastern Costa Rica, previous work has shown that populations of many amphibians have decreased significantly since the 1970s, especially in primary forest. Starting in 1998, we investigated one of the most common frog species at La Selva, the poison-dart frog Oophaga pumilio (= Dendrobates pumilio). In a survey of 50 plots of 100 m2 in 1998, adult frogs were 4.6 times more abundant in secondary forest than in primary forest. Tadpoles were found only in secondary-forest plots. Almost all (89%) of the tadpoles were found in leaf axils of Dieffenbachia spp., which were much more abundant in secondary-forest than in primary-forest plots. The greater abundance of Dieffenbachia spp. in secondary forest was confirmed in a broad survey of ~11 km of trails within La Selva in 2002. When the same trails were resampled in 2012, Dieffenbachia spp. had been extirpated from 72% of the 50-m segments where plants were present in 2002; abundance was greatly reduced in the few trail segments where any Dieffenbachia spp. remained in 2012. The loss of Dieffenbachia spp., especially in secondary forest, removed the species most often used by O. pumilio for tadpole rearing. Based on counts of calling frogs in 2010, there was no difference in O. pumilio abundance in primary versus secondary forest, in striking contrast to multiple earlier surveys that found much greater frog abundance in secondary forest. We propose that the reason for the rapid decline in Dieffenbachia spp. is herbivory by the collared peccary (Pecari tajacu), which has increased in abundance at La Selva in recent years. A likely consequence is continued reduction in O. pumilio populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.