A steady-state, advanced, general fate model developed to study the fate of organic compounds in primary and activated-sludge systems. This model considers adsorption, biodegradation from the dissolved and adsorbed phases, bubble volatilization, and surface volatilization as removal mechanisms. A series of modeling experiments was performed to identify the key trends of these removal mechanisms for compounds with a range of molecular properties. With typical municipal wastewater treatment conditions, the results from the modeling experiments show that co-metabolic and primary utilization mechanisms give very different trends in biodegradation for the compounds tested. For co-metabolism, the effluent concentration increases when the influent concentration increases, while the effluent concentration remains unchanged when primary utilization occurs, For a highly hydrophobic compound (partition coefficient Kd > 0.01 m 3 /g VSS), the fraction of compound removed from adsorption onto primary sludge can be very important, and the direct biodegradation of compound sorbed to the activated sludge greatly increases its biodegradation and reduces its discharge with the waste activated sludge. Volatilization from the surface of the primary and secondary systems is important for compounds with moderate to high volatilities (Henry's law constant H, = 0.001 to 0.1 m 3 water/m 3 air), especially when these compounds are not biodegradable. Finally, bubble volatilization can be a major removal mechanism for highly volatile compounds (He> 0.8 m 3 water/m 3 air), even when they are highly biodegradable. Water Environ. Res., 70, 1118Res., 70, (1998.
A new model that describes the fate of hydrophobic and volatile organic compounds in activated‐sludge treatment includes two novel features. First, all of the mass balances are nonsteady state, which allows the model to describe the effects of transients in loading, temperature, or operation. Second, the model describes the mass transfer of hydrophobic compounds with kinetics, not equilibrium. A series of examples demonstrate the new features of the model and how they can be important. When the kinetics of mass transfer are not fast, hydrophobic compounds remain significantly out of equilibrium, even when the system is operating at steady state. When the loading of a hydrophobic compound increases, its aqueous‐phase concentration approaches (but does not quite reach) its steady‐state concentration much more rapidly than does the density of the adsorbed hydrophobic compound. Finally, the importance of mass‐transport kinetics between the aqueous and sorbed phases suggests that research should be focused on this poorly understood mechanism in activated sludge.
We use a nonsteady-state model to evaluate the effects of community adaptation and sorption kinetics on the fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in batch experiments conducted with activated sludge that was continuously fed different concentrations of LAS. We observed a sharp decrease in the biodegradation rate between 30 and 60 minutes and the presence of an LAS residual at the end of the batch experiments. The modeling analysis indicates that these phenomena were caused by relatively slow inter-phase mass transport of LAS. The modeling analyses also showed that the amount of LAS-degrading biomass increased when the continuous activated sludge was fed a higher LAS concentration. Although community adaptation to LAS involved accumulation of more LAS degraders, the increase was not proportional to the feed concentration of LAS, which supports the concept that LAS degraders also utilized portions of the general biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) fed to the continuous activated sludge systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.