Background To design and develop a surgical robot capable of assisting subretinal injection. Methods A remote center of motion (RCM) mechanical design and a master-slave teleoperation were used to develop and manufacture the assisted subretinal surgery robot (RASR). Ten fresh isolated porcine eyes were divided into the Robot Manipulation (RM) group and Manual Manipulation (MM) group (5 eyes for each group), and subretinal injections were performed by the robot and manual manipulation methods, respectively. A preliminary verification of the robot was performed by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the robot manipulation and manual manipulation by using optical coherent tomography (OCT), fundus photography, and video motion capture analysis after the surgery. Results Both the robot and the manual manipulation were able to perform subretinal injections with a 100% success rate. The OCT results showed that the average subretinal area was 1.548 mm2 and 1.461 mm2 in the RM and MM groups, respectively (P > 0.05). Meanwhile the volume of subretinal fluid obtained using the retinal map mode built in OCT was not statistically different between the RM and MM groups (P > 0.05). By analyzing the surgical video using Kinovea, a motion capture and analysis software, the results suggest that the mean tremor amplitude of the RM group was 0.3681 pixels (x direction), which was significantly reduced compared to 18.8779 pixels (x direction) in the MM group (P < 0.0001). Conclusion Robot-assisted subretinal injection system (RASR) is able to finish subretinal injection surgery with better stability and less fatigue than manual manipulation.

ObjectivesTo evaluate and compare the outcome of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantation with or without deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for bilateral severe limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).MethodsThis retrospective review included 49 eyes of 46 patients who underwent KLAL transplantation at the Department of Ophthalmology of Chinese PLA general hospital, 2009–2020, for bilateral severe LSCD were examined for corneal clarity and corneal scarring to determine whether to combine DALK with KLAL transplantation. Preoperative information, surgical decision tree, surgical procedures, and postoperative data were collected for each eye.ResultsAll patients had preoperative severe or total LSCD. Twenty-four eyes underwent KLAL transplantation only, 25 KLAL transplantation plus DALK. The mean follow-up was 46.80 ± 31.22 months (18–158 months). Overall KLAL survival (with or without DALK) was 71.43% at the final follow-up (KLAL-only 66.67%, KLAL-DALK 76%). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the 3-year survival probability of all grafts was 70.53 ± 10.89% (KLAL-only 64.86 ± 10.11%, KLAL-DALK 75.79 ± 8.62%). The proportion of BCVA ≥ 20/200 eyes among all KLAL transplantations increased from 11 eyes (22.45%) preoperatively to 25 eyes (51.02%) after 1 year and 24 eyes (48.98%) at the last follow-up (P = 0.01). The proportion of BCVA ≥ 20/200 eyes in the KLAL-DALK group increased significantly (P = 0.04), from 16.0% at baseline to 48.0% after 1 year to 44.0% at the last follow-up. Seventeen eyes (34.69%) had postoperative complications.ConclusionKLAL-DALK is an effective option to restore a stable ocular surface and visual acuity rapidly in patients with bilateral, late-stage, severe LSCD.