ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the current situation of vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (VA-AKI) in China and identify the risk factors for VA-AKI, as well as to comprehensively examine the risk related to concurrent drug use. Further, we assessed the outcomes of patients who developed VA-AKI and the risk factors for these outcomes. Finally, we aimed to provide suggestions for improving the prevention and treatment of VA-AKI in China.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of inpatients who had been treated with VAN between January 2013 and December 2013 at Peking University First Hospital. AKI was defined as an increase in SCr of ≥0.3 mg/dl (≥26.5 μmol/l) within 48 hours or an increase to ≥1.5 times the baseline certainly or presumably within the past 7 days. VA-AKI was defined as the development of AKI during VAN therapy or within 7 days following the termination of VAN therapy. In addition, we compared patients with NO-AKI, who did not develop AKI during their hospitalization, with those with VA-AKI.ResultsOf the 934 patients treated with VAN during their hospital stay, 740 were included in this study. Among those excluded, 38.1% (74/194) were excluded because of a lack of data on serum creatinine (SCr). Among the included patients, 120 had confirmed VA-AKI, with an incidence of 16.2% (120/740). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that an elevated baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.009; p = 0.017) and concomitant vasopressor therapy (OR = 2.942; p = 0.009), nitrate use (OR = 2.869; p = 0.007), imipenem-cilastatin treatment (OR = 4.708; p = 0.000), and contrast medium administration (OR = 6.609 p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for VA-AKI; in addition, the receipt of orthopedic/trauma/burn surgery (OR = 0.3575; p = 0.011) and concomitant compound glycyrrhizin use (OR = 0.290; p = 0.017) were independent protective factors for VA-AKI. Multiple logistic regression analysis also demonstrated that among the patients who developed VA-AKI, coronary heart disease (CHD) (OR = 12.6; p = 0.006) and concomitant vasopressor therapy (OR = 15.4; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for death. We also evaluated the factors influencing improvement of renal function. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that CHD (OR = 8.858, p = 0.019) and concomitant contrast medium administration (OR = 9.779, p = 0.005) were independent risk factors and that simultaneous β-blocker treatment (OR = 0.124, p = 0.001) was an independent protective factor for improvement of renal function.ConclusionPatients treated with VAN received insufficient monitoring of SCr and inadequate therapeutic drug monitoring. We recommend that hospitals increase their investment in clinical pharmacists. An elevated baseline eGFR and concomitant vasopressor therapy, nitrate use, imipenem-cilastatin treatment, and contrast medium administration were independent risk factors for VA-AKI; in addition, orthopedic/trauma/burn surgery and concom...

For the elderly Chinese patients treated with VAN, there was insufficient monitoring of SCr, too little use of VAN TDM, and lower rate of patients whose VAN though serum concentrations were not obtained at the correct time. We recommend that hospital managers increase investment in clinical pharmacists, to strengthen professional management. Patients with concomitant hyperuricaemia and on mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy should be paid more attention, and a higher serum albumin was determined to be an independent protective factor for VI-AKI.

Introduction Many concerns still exist regarding the safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19 and other diseases by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the safety of HCQ in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were retrieved starting from the establishment of the database till June 5, 2020. Literature screening, data extraction, and assessment of risk bias were performed independently by two reviewers. Results We identified 53 eligible studies involving 5496 patients. The meta-analysis indicated that the risk of adverse effects (AEs) in the HCQ group was significantly increased compared with that in the control group (RD 0.05, 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.07, P = 0.0002), and the difference was also statistically significant in the COVID-19 subgroup (RD 0.15, 95%CI, 0.07 to 0.23, P = 0.0002) as well as in the subgroup for other diseases (RD 0.03, 95%CI, 0.01 to 0.04, P = 0.003). Conclusions HCQ is associated with a high total risk of AEs compared with the placebo or no intervention in the overall population. Given the small number of COVID-19 participants included, we should be cautious regarding the conclusion stating that HCQ is linked with an increase incidence of AEs in patients with COVID-19, which we hope to confirm in the future through well-designed and larger sample size studies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02962-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.