No abstract

This study investigated the availability of infection control policies and/or guidelines while observing midwives' practices in relation to peripartum sepsis prevention. A participant observational study collected data, in May and June 2014, by means of checklists from 37 purposively selected midwives working in the labour and postnatal wards of two central hospitals in Zimbabwe. Descriptive statistics and SPSS version 20 were used during data analysis. The results indicate lack of resources necessary for good midwifery practice and poor standards of infection control among midwives. Strengthening infection control policies and practices, ensuring resource equitable distribution and training of midwives in peripartum sepsis prevention are essential interventions.

Introduction 98% of the 2.6 million stillbirths per annum occur in low and middle income countries. However, understanding of risk factors for stillbirth in these settings is incomplete, hampering efforts to develop effective strategies to prevent deaths. Methods A cross-sectional study of eligible women on the postnatal ward at Mpilo Hospital, Zimbabwe was undertaken between 01/08/2018 and 31/03/2019 (n = 1779). Data were collected from birth records for maternal characteristics, obstetric and past medical history, antenatal care and pregnancy outcome. A directed acyclic graph was constructed with multivariable logistic regression performed to fit the corresponding model specification to data comprising singleton pregnancies, excluding neonatal deaths (n = 1734), using multiple imputation for missing data. Where possible, findings were validated against all women with births recorded in the hospital birth register (n = 1847). Results Risk factors for stillbirth included: previous stillbirth (29/1691 (2%) of livebirths and 39/43 (91%) of stillbirths, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2628.9, 95% CI 342.8 to 20,163.0), antenatal care (aOR 44.49 no antenatal care vs. > 4 antenatal care visits, 95% CI 6.80 to 291.19), maternal medical complications (aOR 7.33, 95% CI 1.99 to 26.92) and season of birth (Cold season vs. Mild aOR 14.29, 95% CI 3.09 to 66.08; Hot season vs. Mild aOR 3.39, 95% CI 0.86 to 13.27). Women who had recurrent stillbirth had a lower educational and health status (18.2% had no education vs. 10.0%) and were less likely to receive antenatal care (20.5% had no antenatal care vs. 6.6%) than women without recurrent stillbirth. Conclusion The increased risk in women who have a history of stillbirth is a novel finding in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) and is in agreement with findings from High Income Countries (HICs), although the estimated effect size is much greater (OR in HICs ~ 5). Developing antenatal care for this group of women offers an important opportunity for stillbirth prevention.

Introduction A stillbirth is the death of a baby before or during birth and accounts for about 14 in every 1,000 births globally with the highest rates seen in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Stillbirth prevention and bereavement care following stillbirth remains a challenge, particularly in Low-Middle Income Countries (LMiC). One approach to improvement is the prioritisation of women/family-centred care. However, there are a large variety of outcomes measured in stillbirth studies and consensus on the outcomes that matter most to women and families is often lacking, which can impact on the ability to make informed decisions about improved care practices. To help mitigate this problem, a core outcome set (COS) has been developed for stillbirth prevention and another COS has recently been finalised for care after stillbirth. Despite the majority of stillbirths occurring in LMiC involvement in these studies is tokenistic and therefore the outcomes may not reflect the needs of parents or communities in these settings. The aim is to develop standard sets of outcomes for use in all interventional studies for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care using participants from predominantly Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where the burden of stillbirth is highest. Methods/Design This study will involve three stages in the development of the COS: (1) a list of outcomes will be identified from multiple sources, specifically existing reviews of outcomes and a targeted qualitative literature review of studies that have interviewed parents who have experienced stillbirth and healthcare professionals working in this field across Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. (2) The list of outcomes will first be reviewed by in-country leads and scored by multiple stakeholder groups in a real-time online Delphi survey. (3) The results of the Delphi will be summarised and discussed at a face-to-face or virtual consensus meeting with representation from all stakeholder groups. Discussion As well as improving the consistency of outcomes for future research in an LMiC setting, these COS will harmonise with the existing COS in this field developed in a high income setting. The final output will be a global meta-COS, a recommended set of outcomes that can be used in stillbirth research worldwide.