Level III, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Despite the well-documented benefits of exercise, adherence among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) has been low during and after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as well as among patients not attending CR. Therefore, an understanding of the factors that influence exercise in this population is crucial to assist in the development of effective interventions. The goal of this review was to document the correlates of exercise of CHD patients in all CR contexts from a social-ecological perspective that addresses multiple levels of influence on exercise. The search strategy included PubMed, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. In all, 121 studies, examining 32 different correlates of exercise, with a total of 25 217 participants were included. Across all CR contexts, six variables were consistently related to exercise (self-regulatory self-efficacy, health status, intention, perceived control, beliefs/benefits and previous physical activity). Several variables were also related to exercise in three of four contexts (e.g. task self-efficacy, perceived barriers, attitude, action planning, sex and employment status). Many of the variables consistently related to exercise may be amenable to change through the development and implementation of appropriate interventions. Specific suggestions are made for each relevant variable to assist CR staff and other healthcare practitioners in 32 promoting exercise among CHD patients. Current gaps in literature such as a lack of prospective studies and research examining broader (e.g. policy level) correlates are also discussed.
ObjectivesThere remains concern regarding the use of survey data to assess aspects of healthcare quality. The relationship between patient experience and adverse events as documented by patient safety indicators (PSIs) is a timely research topic. The objectives were to document the association of PSIs and patient experience scores, and to determine risk-adjusted odds of high experience scores versus PSI presence.Setting and participantsFrom April 2011 to March 2014, 25 098 patients completed a telephone survey following discharge from 93 inpatient hospitals in Alberta, Canada.Research designA modified version of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) instrument was used. Surveys were linked to inpatient records and PSI presence was documented using a validated algorithm.MeasuresThree questions about overall hospital, physician and nurse ratings were scored on an 11-point Likert scale from 0 (worst) to 10 (best). Experience was classified as high (9 or 10) versus low (0–8). Demographic/clinical differences between respondents with/without a PSI were assessed. Logistic regression examined the relationship between factors including PSI and experience ratings.ResultsOverall, physician and nurse care was rated high by 61.9%, 73.7% and 66.2% of respondents. 1085 patients (4.3%) had a documented PSI. Most frequent PSIs were haemorrhagic events (n=502; 2.0% of sample), events relating to obstetrics (n=373; 1.5%) and surgical-related events (n=248; 1.0%). Risk-adjusted models showed patients with PSIs had decreased odds of having high overall (OR=0.86; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97), physician (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87) and nurse (OR=0.83; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94) ratings.ConclusionsThere is clear evidence that inpatient experience ratings are associated with PSIs, one element of quality of care. Future research, examining individual PSIs and patient experience questions, is warranted, as this may inform targeted quality improvement initiatives.
Our results show that although WC patients experience substantial benefits from various treatments for full-thickness RC tears, disparities exist between them and their non-WC counterparts. The lack of WC-specific literature limited our results. Larger studies, particularly ones comparing WC patients with their non-compensable counterparts, are crucial to allow for future evidence-based recommendations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.