No abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of imidafenacin on nocturia and sleep disorder in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Patients and Methods: A prospective multicenter study of imidafenacin 0.1 mg twice daily for patients with OAB and nocturia was conducted. At baseline and at week 4 and 8, patients were assessed using the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), frequency volume charts (FVC) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: Treatment with imidafenacin significantly improved OAB symptoms. Imidafenacin also improved PSQI, especially subjective sleep quality, sleep latency and daytime dysfunction. In FVC, the number of daytime voids and nighttime voids significantly decreased and average voided volume significantly increased after imidafenacin. Subanalysis of FVC based on the patients’ age revealed that nocturnal polyuria was more often found in patients aged 75 years or over than in those aged under 75 years (79 vs. 55%, p < 0.05). Treatment with imidafenacin significantly reduced the nocturnal polyuria index only in patients aged 75 years or over. Conclusions: Imidafenacin can improve nocturia and sleep disorder in patients with OAB. The efficacy of imidafenacin on nocturia is attributable to an increase in bladder capacity and a decrease in nocturnal urine volume. We conclude that imidafenacin is an effective and safe drug for nocturia in patients with OAB.

Abbreviations & AcronymsObjectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate on nocturia and sleep disorders in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Methods: A prospective multicenter study including lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction patients with nocturia (twice or more) undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate was carried out. All patients were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline, and 6 months after transurethral resection of the prostate. Results: Overall, 49 patients were included in the study. A total of 20 of them (41%) had a sleep disorder defined as a score of 5.5 or more on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score. The nocturia score significantly correlated with component 4 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (habitual sleep efficiency). Nocturia significantly decreased after transurethral resection of the prostate from 3.0 ± 1.2 to 1.9 ± 0.8, whereas the global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score did not. In 20 patients with a sleep disorder before transurethral resection of the prostate, subjective sleep quality (component 1) and habitual sleep efficiency (component 4) significantly decreased after transurethral resection of the prostate, but this was not the case for the global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score. In 16 patients with a persistent sleep disorder after transurethral resection of the prostate, International Prostate Symptom Score, voiding and storage symptoms score were higher than those of patients without a sleep disorder, although the nocturia score improved equivalently in both groups. Conclusions: Transurethral resection of the prostate diminishes nocturnal urinary frequency and partly improves sleep quality in patients with nocturia and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. A persistent sleep disorder after transurethral resection of the prostate is associated with persistent voiding and storage symptoms.

A 69-year-old man presented initially with back pain and incomplete bilateral lower limb paralysis. The level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the patient was elevated to 167.0 ng/ml, and multiple bone metastases were detected. Thoracic laminectomy was performed in an emergency due to spinal decompression. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with prostate cancer from an examination of resected bone specimens. Combined androgen blockade with degarelix and bicalutamide was initiated in October 2013. Consequently, the serum PSA level decreased to <1.0 ng/ml, but thereafter gradually increased. Subsequent bicalutamide withdrawal response was not observed, and switch of anti-androgen therapy to flutamide also resulted in a poor response. Then, abiraterone (1,000 mg daily) in combination with prednisolone (10 mg daily) was initiated when the level of PSA increased to 35.9 ng/ml in June 2015. The level of PSA decreased to the lowest point of 4 ng/ml; however, PSA level increased again to 21.7 ng/ml in April 2016. Consequently, a 'steroid switch' was attempted. Abiraterone therapy was continued, but concomitant corticosteroid was switched from prednisone to dexamethasone (1.0 mg per day). Fortunately, serum PSA level decreased promptly to the lowest point of 0.6 ng/ml. In the present case report, a review of recent literature was presented and potential explanations of the mechanism underlying the 'steroid switch' were described. Pharmacokinetic differences between dexamethasone and prednisolone may partially explain why the 'steroid switch' occurs. Other mechanisms may include the activation of the glucocorticoid receptor, mineralocorticoid receptor and/or mutant androgen receptor. Corticosteroids accelerate a number of transcription factors, cellular growth factors and cytokines, which may also be potential mechanisms. The 'steroid switch' at PSA progression might be a feasible option for therapy, which may delay the development of the disease. Although the underlying mechanisms require further study, clinicians should pay attention to this phenomenon.

False-positive 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scan in a patient with renal cell carcinoma: A case of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma oncocytic variant with a complicated clinical course. IJU