[1] This paper reports on several substorms observed under northward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions, the intensity of which was at least as significant as that of typical substorms under moderately southward IMF conditions. Such northward IMF periods were identified during the recovery phase of three strong storms. In the case of each storm, two or more substorms occurred successively, being separated by $1.8-5 h, while the IMF condition continued persistently northward. The substorms are clearly evidenced by auroral and other complementary observations. For the most intense substorms, the auroral breakup occurred at the magnetic latitude of $58°, and for the others it was between 60°and 65°. The polar cap size prior to each onset was substantial despite the northward IMF conditions. The auroral expansion following each onset lasted from a few up to several magnetic local time hours and exhibited a clear poleward expansion feature. For most of the events studied, geosynchronous magnetic dipolarizations preceded by field stretching and/or energetic particle injections occurred. The occurrence of such (intense) substorms implies that a certain (large) amount of energy remains in the tail even under northward IMF conditions. The occurrence of two or more successive substorms further implies that even after the release of a certain amount of energy triggered by the substorm, the tail can still have a substantial amount of energy left, which can be released by a subsequent substorm(s). We conjecture that an intense substorm during a northward IMF period can be expected when such a period belongs to the recovery phase of an intense storm mainly because of large energy loading done by preceding southward IMF B z during the storm's main (and some early recovery) phase. In addition we argue that substorm energy can also be supplied by other mechanisms of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling under northward IMF conditions such as dayside reconnection in the presence of a substantial IMF B y component.
Rapid injection of MeV electrons associated with strong substorm dipolarization has been suggested as a potential explanation for some radiation belt enhancement events. However, it has been difficult to quantify the contribution of MeV electron injections to radiation belt enhancements. This paper presents two isolated MeV electron injection events for which we quite precisely quantify how the entire outer‐belt immediately changed with the injections. Tracking detailed outer‐belt evolution observed by Van Allen Probes, for both events, we identify large step‐like relativistic electron enhancements (roughly 1 order of magnitude increase for ∼2 MeV electron fluxes) for L ≳ 3.8 and L ≳ 4.6, respectively, that occurred on ∼30‐min time scales nearly instantaneously with the injections. The enhancements occurred almost simultaneously for 10s keV to multi‐MeV electrons, with the lowest L of enhancement region located farther out for higher energy. The outer‐belt stayed at these new levels for ≳several hours without substantial subsequent enhancements.
Small-scale magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs) are observed more frequently than larger-scale magnetic flux ropes (e.g., magnetic clouds) in interplanetary space. We selected 235 SMFRs by applying cylindrical linear force-free fitting to 20-year observations of the Wind satellite, which meets the criteria of low beta, low temperature, an enhanced magnetic field, and a rotation feature. By examining the pitch angle distribution of suprathermal electrons for these events, we found that approximately 45.1% of the SMFRs were accompanied by unidirectional beams (strahl). A much smaller percentage of SMFRs (∼10.7%) were associated with bidirectional beams. We also found a small percentage (∼7.2%) of (sunward) conic distributions during SMFR events. Last, the remaining ∼37.0% of SMFRs were associated with complex electron distributions. The unidirectional beams and most of the conics (together corresponding to ∼50% of the total 235 SMFRs) imply open-field SMFRs with only one end connected to the Sun. For ∼37.7% of the unidirectional beam SMFRs, the local IMF field polarity was orthogonal or inverted (possibly due to interchange reconnection). Based on the solar wind conditions around the bidirectional beams, we suggest that more than half of the bidirectional beams were not necessarily closed-field-line SMFRs.
Small-scale magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs) have been identified at a large range of heliospheric distances from the Sun. Their features are somewhat similar to those of larger-scale flux rope structures such as magnetic clouds (MCs), while their occurrence rate is far higher. In this work, we examined the orientations of a large number of SMFRs that were identified at 1 au by fitting to the force-free model. We find that, while most of the SMFRs lie mostly close to the ecliptic plane, as previously known, their azimuthal orientations relative to the Sun–Earth line are found largely at two specific angles (slightly less than 45° and 225°). This latter feature in turn leads to a strong statistical trend in which the axis of SMFRs lies at a large tilt angle relative to (most often nearly orthogonal to) the corresponding background interplanetary magnetic field directions in the ecliptic plane. This feature is different from previous reports on SMFRs—and in stark contrast to the cases of MCs. This is an important observational constraint that should be considered for understanding SMFR generation and propagation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.