No abstract

The minute ventilation is known to be one of the most physiological indicators of exercise. A curvilinear relationship between VE and the normal sinus rhythm (NSR) has been demonstrated in healthy patients. The aim of this study is to show that a pacemaker based on a VE sensor can reproduce such a relationship. Eighty-one patients received a Talent DR 213 (ELA Medical, Montrouge, France) pacemaker with a third-generation rate responsive algorithm. At 1-month follow-up, the patients underwent a treadmill exercise test, after which three groups were defined: group 1 had 6 patients who were 100% paced throughout the exercise test; group 2 had 10 patients who maintained NSR throughout the test; and group 3 had 12 patients who had cardiopulmonary recording during the exercise test. In group 1 patients, the simulation function computed the simulated rate (sim-rate), which was compared to the sensor-driven rate (SDR). In group 2 patients, sim-rate was compared to the NSR. In group 3 patients, cardiac and metabolic reserves were compared to determine the appropriateness of the rate response to exercise (HRR% vs MR%). The results showed that the mean correlation coefficient between sim-rate and SDR was 0.983 +/- 0.005 (P < 0.001); the mean correlation coefficient between NSR and SDR was 0.92 +/- 0.07 (P < 0.001); and a linear relationship was found between HRR% and MR%, with a mean slope of 1.1 +/- 0.2 that was significantly equal to the theoretical value of 1 (P = NS). In conclusion, combining an activity-driven sensor with a physiological sensor allows the preservation of a physiological rate response during exercise.

Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are commonly encountered in DDD paced patients. Newer dual chamber pacemakers (PM) possess mode switching functions that convert pacing to an asynchronous mode when AAs are detected. The lack of a reliable mode switch leading to rapid, irregular ventricular responses may result from AA undersensing. To avoid this the DDDR PM Chorum 7234 Ela Medical AA diagnosis is based on a statistical approach: the PM constantly compares arrhythmic and sinus cycles and, based on "strong" and "weak" criteria, provides for rapid or slower mode switch. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency and reliability of these two criteria. Thirty-one patients with a Chorum 7234 implanted for AV block (11), sinus dysfunction (10), both (5), or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (5) were evaluated at 24 hours and 1 month using the internal memory (IM) of the PM, surface 24-hour Holter recordings, and exercise testing. Interrogation of the IM on the first day of study showed that 8 patients had mode switching episodes, based only on the strong criterion confirmed by the surface Holter recording. At 1 month, the IM revealed mode switching episodes in 12 patients, 6 of whom had used the weak criterion. No inappropriate mode switching episodes was recorded during exercise testing at the 1-month follow-up. These results confirm the reliability and efficiency of this algorithm as well as the requirement for a specific algorithm to compensate for transient loss of sensing during AA.

Rate responsive pacing based on minute ventilation (VE) correlates highly with metabolic demand. This type of sensing also recognizes extended periods of rest. The Chorum pacemaker includes a rate responsive algorithm that modulates the basic rate according to phases of activity versus sleep. Forty-six patients (mean age 78 +/- 15), received a Chorum pacemaker for atrioventricular block in 17 cases, sick sinus syndrome in 25, and mixed disorders in 4. Holter monitoring was performed to analyze to heart rate and to examine the circadian adaptation of the minimal pacing rate. The mean basic rate was programmed at 63 +/- 5 beats/min, and the sleep rate at 52 +/- 4 beats/min. Seventeen patients had spontaneous heart rates consistently above the programmed basic rate, and 6 had sustained supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. One-half of the patients had periods of pacing at the programmed sleep rate. The mean diurnal pacing rate was 68 +/- 5 beats/min compared to a mean nocturnal rate of 60 +/- 4 beats/min (P < 0.0001). The average time spent at the basic rate was 37 +/- 30 min (0-110) during daytime (4%), versus 242 +/- 153 min (20-477) at night (45%, P < 0.0001). No adverse effect was observed in this patient population. VE allows a reliable detection of the sleeping periods as well as an adjustment of the basic rate in accordance. Caution is advised in cases of bradycardia dependent tachyarrhythmias.

No abstract