No abstract

Summary.Technosphere/Insulin (TI) is a formulation of regular human insulin and Technosphere, a new drug delivery system for pulmonary administration. The formulation is designed for efficient transport of insulin across the intact respiratory epithelium into the systemic circulation. We have investigated the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of Technosphere/Insulin in five healthy, non-smoking volunteers. In an open, randomized, three-way crossover study, subjects received 5 IU regular human insulin (HI) intravenously, 10 IU HI subcutaneously; and 100 IU TI via inhalation using a small commercially available asthma inhaler. The time action profiles of all three insulin formulations were assessed by the euglycemic glucose clamp technique on three different study days. Glucose infusion rates were monitored from 2 h before until 6 h after insulin administration. Other study measures were serum insulin, serum C-peptide concentrations, and safety parameters. The inhalation of TI was well tolerated. The time to peak action was significantly shorter with both i.v. injection and inhalation, as compared to s.c. (14 +/- 6 min and 39 +/- 36 min vs. 163 +/- 25 min; p < 0.0002 and p < 0.007 (mean +/- SD)). The metabolic effect during the first 3 h after insulin administration was higher with inhaled TI than with HI s.c. (AUC0-180 for glucose infusion rate: 1.94 +/- 0.77 mg/kg * min vs. 1.15 +/- 0.50 mg/kg * min; p < 0.04). Relative and absolute bioavailability for the first 3 h were 26 +/- 12% and 15 +/- 5% respectively (6 h: 16 +/- 8 and 16 +/- 6%). We conclude that inhalation of TI leads to a rapid onset of metabolic action resembling the effect observed with i.v. administration of regular HI. Despite the use of a common asthma inhaler, bioavailability over the three hour prandial period was substantially greater than with other reported pulmonary systems. Therefore, inhalation of Technosphere/Insulin may become a suitable and attractive alternative for prandial insulin delivery, especially for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Summary Subcutaneous insulin absorption kineticswere assessed in 50 healthy study subjects (21 female, 29 male; age 26 + 3 years, BMI 22.5 + 1.8 kg/m2; mean + SD) during 45 min after periumbilical injection of soluble human U40-or U100-insulin (0.15 IU/kg). Subcutaneous fat thickness was measured by ultrasound, and skin temperature at the injection site was registered. Serum insulin concentrations increased within 30 min from basal values of 37 + 15 to 140 + 46 pmol/1 after U40-insulin and from 36 + 10 to 116 _+ 37 pmol/1 after U100-insulin (p < 0.001). After 45 min serum insulin concentrations were 164 _+ 43 pmol/1 with U40-insulin and 128 + 35 pmol/1 with U100-insulin (p < 0.001).Decline in blood glucose levels and suppression of Cpeptide were comparable. The serum insulin levels reached 30 and 45 min after U40-and U100-insulin injection were positively correlated with skin temperature (p < 0.0008), and negatively correlated with subcutaneous fat thickness (p < 0.009). In conclusion, the lower insulin concentration of U40-insulin, higher skin temperature, and a thinner subcutaneous fat tissue at the injection site are associated with accelerated and enhanced subcutaneous insulin absorption. [Diabetologia (1994) 37: 377-380]

No abstract

We studied the effect of an ACE inhibitor (Enalapril [ENA], 10 mg o.d.) and a calcium-channel blocker (Nitrendipine [NIT], 20 mg o.d.) on insulin sensitivity in a double-blind cross-over study. Insulin sensitivity was measured by a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Serum potassium concentrations were kept constant during the clamp procedure by means of a variable potassium infusion. Twenty patients with essential hypertension (age 35+/-12 years [mean+/-SD], BMI 31.9+/-5.0 kg m2, initial blood pressure 152+/-10/99+/-6 mmHg) were treated with ENA or NIT for 4 weeks, respectively, with a wash-out period of 3 weeks. No carry-over effects or period effects were observed. Both drugs induced a comparable decline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (ENA - 15+/-9/ - 13+/-8 mmHg, NIT -16+/-8/- 12+/-6 mmHg). No significant change in body weight occurred with both treatments (ENA -0.4+/-2.0; NIT 0.6+/-1.1 kg). Neither drug had a significant impact on any parameter of insulin sensitivity measured (e.g. insulin sensitivity index SI: ENA 5.2+/-2.0 [basal 5.1+/-2.2], NIT 5.8+/-3.0 [basal SI 5.1+/-2.4) mi/min x m2/microU/ml). In conclusion, no significant differences between ENA and NIT on insulin sensitivity were observed. The reduction of blood pressure had no apparent effect on insulin sensitivity.