The good correlations between GNDS and both EDSS and MSFC were mainly due to the importance of spinal-cord-related neurologic functions in all three scoring systems. A marked discrepancy was found for the assessment of cognition between objective measurements and subjective complaints. Because patients' self-reporting correlates well with results of physical examination, GNDS can offer a valuable way to measure disease impact in MS. However, GNDS is not an adequate screen of cognitive dysfunction.

Endogenous glucocorticoids (GC), which are under control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, play an important role in controlling chronic inflammatory demyelinating diseases, like multiple sclerosis (MS). Increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity has been found in MS patients and appeared to be negatively associated with acute inflammation. Exogenous GC are frequently used to treat relapses in MS, but the response to this treatment differs among patients, suggesting differences in sensitivity to GC. Previous, relatively small studies investigating GC sensitivity have yielded conflicting results. In the present study, we have investigated GC sensitivity in peripheral blood cells of MS patients (n = 117) and healthy controls (n = 45). GC sensitivity was measured by the in vitro suppressive effect of GC on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated TNF-alpha production. Blood cells of MS patients, especially relapsing remitting MS patients, were less sensitive to GC compared with blood cells of healthy controls. This turned out to be unrelated to previous treatment with exogenous GC expressed as frequency of courses of iv steroids or interval since last course. The use of interferon beta was found to be associated with a lower GC sensitivity. However, after correction for the use of interferon beta, relapsing remitting MS patients remained less sensitive to GC.

Because the development of new treatments in multiple sclerosis as well as the awareness of the importance of patient-oriented measures have become more important in the last two decades, new outcome measures have been developed with the aim of being more responsive to change and more clinically relevant to patients. The ability to detect improvement is sparsely studied. In the present study we evaluate the responsiveness of the Expanded Disability Status Scale and two quantitative tests (the timed 25-foot walk test and the nine-hole peg test) separately and in combination, to detect improvement after intravenous methylprednisolone. The Expanded Disability Status Scale, the timed 25-foot walk test and the nine-hole peg test were assessed in 112 multiple sclerosis patients before and 6 weeks after intravenous methylprednisolone. In addition patients were asked to rate their change as an anchor to evaluate the performance of the tests. Combining the timed 25-foot walk test and the nine-hole peg test turned out to be the optimal combination of measures to predict patient perceived improvement (positive predictive value of 67% and a negative predictive value of 59%, likelihood ratio of positive test 2.31 (95% confidence interval 1.08-4.95)). In the higher Expanded Disability Status Scale range (4.5 and higher), for all measures a significant change was more often perceived as clinically relevant than in the lower disability range. The Expanded Disability Status Scale seems not to be the preferred outcome of choice to detect patient perceived improvement in multiple sclerosis, especially in the lower Expanded Disability Status Scale range. Combining the timed walk test and the nine-hole peg test can improve the sensitivity to detect clinically relevant changes without conceding with respect to specificity.

No abstract

No abstract