2001
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.7.934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of patient self-report, neurologic examination, and functional impairment in MS

Abstract: The good correlations between GNDS and both EDSS and MSFC were mainly due to the importance of spinal-cord-related neurologic functions in all three scoring systems. A marked discrepancy was found for the assessment of cognition between objective measurements and subjective complaints. Because patients' self-reporting correlates well with results of physical examination, GNDS can offer a valuable way to measure disease impact in MS. However, GNDS is not an adequate screen of cognitive dysfunction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most limitations mentioned are lessened or overcome by the large number of patients for a rare disease, enhancing the power of the study and compensating for missing data. Other strengths are the longitudinal character of the study, with duration of 12½ years, and the use of standardized instruments that have been extensively validated in diverse populations 18, 27, 30, 44, 45. The latter also enables the comparison of the burden of VWM to other patient groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most limitations mentioned are lessened or overcome by the large number of patients for a rare disease, enhancing the power of the study and compensating for missing data. Other strengths are the longitudinal character of the study, with duration of 12½ years, and the use of standardized instruments that have been extensively validated in diverse populations 18, 27, 30, 44, 45. The latter also enables the comparison of the burden of VWM to other patient groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multiple sclerosis (MS) literature, research into self-awareness of cognitive deficits has been inconclusive, with a number of studies suggesting that people with MS are generally accurate in their report of their cognitive functioning (Basso et al, 2008;Benedict et al, 2004;Chiaravalloti & DeLuca, 2003;Kujala, Portin, & Ruutiainen, 1996;Matotek, Saling, Gates, & Sedal, 2001;, and others disputing this (Beatty & Monson, 1991;Christodoulou et al, 2005;Gold et al, 2001;Hoogervorst et al, 2001;Maor, Olmer, & Mozes, 2001;Marrie, Chelune, Miller, & Cohen, 2005;Middleton, Denney, Lynch, & Parmenter, 2006). Researchers have tended to use measures that assess awareness of overall cognitive functioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients' self-report of physical status correlates better with objective physical examination than patients' self-report of cognitive status correlates with objective cognitive performance [39]. A similar discrepancy was reported between patients' and carers' reports of the impact of MS on daily life: the physical scale achieved better agreement between patients and carers than the psychological scale [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%