No abstract

No abstract

Snow cover depletion curve (SDC) is one of the important variables in snow hydrological applications, and these curves are very much required for snowmelt runoff modeling in a snowfed catchment. Remote sensing is an important source of snow cover area which is used for preparation of SDC. Snow cover maps produced by Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellites are one of the best source of satellite-based snow cover area at a regular interval. Therefore, in this study, snow cover maps have been prepared for the years 2000-2005 using MODIS data. The study area chosen viz. Beas basin up to Pandoh dam falls in western Himalayan region. For snowmelt runoff modeling, catchment is divided into number of elevation zones and SDC is required for each zone. When sufficient satellite data are not available due to cloud cover or due to some other reasons, then SDC can to be generated using temperature data. Under changed climate conditions also, modified SDC is required. Therefore, to have SDC under such situations, a relationship between snow cover area and cumulative mean temperature has been developed for each zone of the catchment. This procedure of having snow cover maps has two main purposes. First, it could potentially be used to generate snow cover maps when cloud-free satellite data are not available. Second, it can be used to generate snowcovered area in a new climate to see the impact of climate change on snowmelt runoff studies.

No abstract

Modeling watershed hydrological processes are important for water resources planning, development, and management. In this study, the MIKE 11-NAM (Nedbor-Afstromings Model model) was evaluated for simulation of streamflow from the Bina basin located in the Madhya Pradesh State of India. The model was calibrated and validated on a daily basis using five years (1994-1998) observed hydrological data. In addition, a model sensitivity analysis was performed on nine MIKE 11-NAM parameters to identify sensitive model parameters. Statistical and graphical approaches were used to assess the performance of the model in simulating the streamflow of the basin. Results show that during daily model calibration, the model performed very well with a coefficient of determination (R 2) and the percentage of water balance error (WBL) values 0.87% and −8.63%, respectively. In addition, the model performed good during the validation period with R 2 and WBL values of 0.68% and −6.72%, respectively. Model sensitivity analysis results showed that Overland flow runoff coefficient (CQOF), Time constant for routing overland flow (CK1,2) and Maximum water content in root zone storage (L max) were found as the most influential and sensitive model parameters for simulating streamflow. Overall, the model's performance was satisfactory based on R 2 and EI metrics.