The aim of our research was to verify the impact of the selected training means of training load in the interval of 10 weeks during the competition period in the season 2021/2022 and to diagnose changes in selected indicators of reactive and planned agility in the senior extra-league woman team of floorball players in the club VŠK PdF UK Hurikán Bratislava. The research group consisted of woman floorball players (n = 12, aged 22,6 ± 1,6). Motor indicators consisted of reactive agility tests (Y-Agility test, modified Fitro Agility Check-test) and running agility (T-Agility test). For more accurate measurement, we used Mircrogate photocells, the Witty Sem Microgate signalling light device. The result of our work was the detection of statistically significant changes in the differences at the 5% and 10% level of significance, which we noted due to the influence of selected means of training load. In the indicators of reactive agility in the Y-Agility test, we reached a statistically significant P-value (0.054) at the 10% level of significance. In the Fitro Agility Check test, we recorded a statistically significant P -value (0.071) at the 10% level of significance. In the T-test indicator of planned agility, we found a P-value (0.934), which did not correspond to any of the monitored levels of significance. We confirmed that in our monitored team of woman floorball players the level of reactive agility in the Y-agility and Fitro Agility Check tests was higher, also confirmed by statistical level of significance. On the contrary, we did not found a significant increase in the level of planned agility test and no statistical significance was confirmed. We recommend regularly working on increasing the level of reactive agility in team sports in all age categories.Acknowledgements: The contribution was realized as a part of the grant project VEGA 1/0313/22 -Identification of reactive agility factors in team sports.

The subject of the study was to verify the influence of concentration on decision-making speed and agility in a motor task. The concentration was simulated through an ascending alternative time limit (+1, +2s). The object of the investigation was a group of 26 active athletes (n = 26, 180.62 cm; 20.12 years old), of which 15 were men and 11 were women. The average time per individual stimulus and the total time (t = 0.01s) were evaluated. The evaluation of the significance of differences according to the length of concentration did not confirm significant differences in decision-making speed and agility in the average reaction time in men [Sig.= 0.603 -Sig = 0.973; p > α]; of women [Sig.= 0.062 -Sig = 0.085; p > α]; nor in the total time of the simulated motor task men; [Sig.= 0.284 -Sig = 0.887; p > α]; women [Sig.= 0.082 -Sig = 0.772 ; p > α]. We note that the influence of concentration on decision-making speed and agility has not been proven.