Detection of tumor cells in blood and bone marrow is increasingly used for the staging of patients with breast cancer and to evaluate the presence of tumor cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell collections to be used after high-dose therapy. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of three different methods for detection of tumor cells among non-tumor tissue. An immunocytochemical assay using antibodies directed against epitopes of the cytokeratin-19 (CK19) protein and two RNA-based methods: reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification (NASBA) for the same target gene were tested. With all the three methods, false-positive results were observed when peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of healthy volunteers were tested. There was no concordance between the RNA-based assays and the immunocytochemical assay. The false-positive results in the RNA-based assays may be due to 'illegitimate expression' of epithelial genes in normal PBMC. The false-positive results in the immunocytochemical assay resulted from background staining of monocytes and granulocytes. This study demonstrates that CK19 is not a suitable target to detect the presence of breast tumor tells in PBMC. To reliably detect circulating tumor cells with RNA methods, the selection of suitable target genes is required, which are highly expressed in tumors but not at all in normal cells of blood and bone marrow. Genes with such characteristics may be identifiable with novel differential display techniques.

Increasingly, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) is used to detect clinically significant tumour cells in blood or bone marrow. This may result in a redefinition of disease-free and clinical relapse. However, its clinical utility may be limited by lack of automation or reproducibility. Recent studies have suggested nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of target RNA may be more robust. In this study, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification was established to detect melanoma, colorectal and prostate cancer cells. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and RT–PCR both successfully amplified target RNA in peripheral blood samples from patients with melanoma and colorectal cancer, but only RT–PCR detected PSA in blood samples from patients with prostate cancer. There was relatively good agreement between sample replicates analyzed by RT–PCR (Kappa values of one for tyrosinase, 0.67 for CK-20 and one for PSA), but less agreement when analyzed by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. This may limit the routine use of NASBA for the detection of clinically significant disease. In summary, RT–PCR appears at present to be the most reliable and reproducible method for the detection of low-level disease in cancer patients, although prospective studies are warranted to assess the clinical utility of different molecular diagnostic methods. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86 , 102–109. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600014 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 The Cancer Research Campaign