OBJECTIVEMannose-binding lectin (MBL) is an essential component of the acute-phase immune response and may thus play a role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. The serum concentration of MBL is mainly genetically determined, and elevated concentrations have been associated with both type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. Previous genetic studies have not been conclusive due to the small number of patients and polymorphisms studied. We investigated whether MBL2 polymorphisms are associated with type 1 diabetes or diabetic nephropathy and whether patients with nephropathy have elevated MBL concentrations as indicated previously. Furthermore, we studied the association between MBL2 polymorphisms and MBL concentration.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe genotyped 20 MBL2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a large, well-characterized Finnish case-control sample consisting of 1,297 patients with type 1 diabetes with or without nephropathy and 701 nondiabetic individuals. The serum concentration of MBL was available for 1,064 patients.RESULTSWe found that 19 SNPs were associated with the MBL concentration (P = 3 × 10−81–7 × 10−4). MBL concentrations were higher in patients with macroalbuminuria compared with patients without nephropathy even when the patients were stratified by the MBL2 genotypic background in accordance with previous studies. However, no evidence of association between any of the SNPs or their haplotype combinations and type 1 diabetes or diabetic nephropathy was observed.CONCLUSIONSAlthough most of the MBL2 SNPs studied were associated with the MBL concentration, no common variations (neither single SNPs nor their haplotype combinations) confer risk of type 1 diabetes or diabetic nephropathy.

No abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Substantial evidence exists for the involvement of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in diabetic nephropathy. Angiotensin I converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a new component of the RAS, has been implicated in kidney disease, hypertension and cardiac function. Based on this, the aim of the present study was to evaluate whether variations in ACE2 are associated with diabetic nephropathy. Materials and methods: We used a cross-sectional, case-control study design to investigate 823 Finnish type 1 diabetic patients (365 with and 458 without nephropathy). Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped using TaqMan technology. Haplotypes were estimated using PHASE software, and haplotype frequency differences were analysed using a χ 2 -test-based tool. Results: None of the ACE2 polymorphisms was associated with diabetic nephropathy, and this finding was supported by the haplotype analysis. The ACE2 polymorphisms were not associated with blood pressure, BMI or HbA 1 c. Conclusions/ interpretation: In Finnish type 1 diabetic patients, ACE2 polymorphisms are not associated with diabetic nephropathy or any studied risk factor for this complication. Further studies are necessary to assess a minor effect of ACE2.

No abstract