No abstract

5098 Background and Aims Increased ferritin and body iron stores are frequently observed in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), associated with heightened susceptibility to vascular damage. Conflicting data have been reported on the role of iron in atherosclerosis, with recent data suggesting that excess iron induces vascular damage by increasing levels of the hormone hepcidin, which would determine iron trapping into macrophages, oxidative stress, and promotion of transformation into foam cells. Aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between iron status and cardiovascular damage in NAFLD. Methods and Results Vascular damage was evaluated by common carotid arteries intima-media thickness (CC-IMT) measurement and plaque detection by ecocolor-doppler ultrasonography in 506 patients with clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of NAFLD, HFE mutations by restriction analysis in 342 patients. Serum hepcidin-25 was measured by time-of-flight mass spectrometry in 143 patients. At multivariate analysis CC-IMT was associated with systolic blood pressure, glucose, LDL cholesterol, abdominal circumference, age, and ferritin (p=0.048). Carotid plaques were independently associated with age, ferritin (p=0.0004), glucose, and hypertension. Ferritin reflected iron stores and metabolic syndrome components, but not inflammation or liver damage. Hyperferritinemia was associated with increased vascular damage only in patients with HFE genotypes associated with hepcidin upregulation by iron stores (p<0.0001), and serum hepcidin-25 was independently associated with carotid plaques (p=0.05). Conclusion Ferritin levels, reflecting iron stores, are independent predictors of vascular damage in NAFLD. The mechanism may involve upregulation of hepcidin levels by increased iron stores in patients not carrying HFE mutations, and iron compartmentalization into macrophages. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

deficiency (FLD); Hyperchylomicronemia were used for protein detection analysis and functional test. Furthermore, in vitro experiments were performed in HEK293 cells. Protein synthesis and secretion were analyzed in lysate and medium fraction, respectively, whereas medium fraction was used for functional assay. RESULTS: We identified two novel mutations in the LPL gene causing type 1 hyperlipoproteinemia: a two base pair deletion (c.765_766delAG) resulting in a frameshift at position 256 of the protein (p.G256TfsX26) and a nucleotide substitution (c.1211 T. G) resulting in a methionine to arginine substitution (p.M404 R). LPL protein and activity were not detected in pre-heparin or post-heparin plasma of the patient with p.G256TfsX26 mutation or in the medium of HEK293 cells overexpressing recombinant p.G256TfsX26 LPL. A relatively small amount of LPL p.M404 R was detected in both pre-heparin and post-heparin plasma and in the medium of the cells, whereas no LPL activity was detected. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that these two novel mutations cause type 1 hyperlipoproteinemia by inducing a loss or reduction in LPL secretion accompanied by a loss of LPL enzymatic activity.

No abstract